Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move Wayback-dedup module to heritrix-contrib #90

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Aug 27, 2014

Conversation

kngenie
Copy link
Member

@kngenie kngenie commented Aug 26, 2014

this patch adds WbmPersistLoadProcessor, a module for fetching recrawl info from Wayback CDX server.

I rewrote it for org.apache.httpcomponent/httpclient 4.3.3 (required by heritrix-common) and junit 3. During rewrite, I found heritrix-contrib's hadoop dependency is pulling in older version of httpclient and JUnit 4. So this patch also adds dependency exclusions for jets3t and junit to hbase-client to address this problem. (Note heritrix-common also depends on jets3t 0.5.0, which does not depend on httpclient).

chnaged groupId to address duplicate groupId warning.
template string with placeholders. no hard-coded parameters.
allows turning gzip compression on/off.
main for quick test.
metric failedCount, add missedCount and errorCount.
  HQ modules: for method removed in Heritrix, API deprecated in httpclient
  WBM-dedup: fix NPE in FetchHistoryProcessor due to changed expectation.
	lock httpclient version to 4.3.3 stated by
	heritrix-commons. have to exclude hadoop’s
	dependency on jets3t 0.9.0 as it pulls in		httpcore 4.1.2.
	add easy mock 3.1 to heritrix-contrib.
	(code commented out during update for httpclient 4.3.3)
rewrite WbmPersistLoadProcessorTest for JUnit 3.
  (also disable a test that depends on production CDX server)
nlevitt added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2014
Move Wayback-dedup module to heritrix-contrib
@nlevitt nlevitt merged commit 9e1ade3 into internetarchive:master Aug 27, 2014
@kngenie kngenie deleted the wbm-recrawl branch August 28, 2014 00:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants