fixed bug in multiple observable analysis

[drosetti]

Description

fixed bug in multiple observable analysis: all observable had the type of the first one

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected).

Checklist

• I have read and understood the rules about how to Contribute to this project
• The pull request is for the branch develop
• A new plugin (analyzer, connector, visualizer, playbook, pivot or ingestor) was added or changed, in which case:
  • I strictly followed the documentation "How to create a Plugin"
  • Usage file was updated.
  • Advanced-Usage was updated (in case the plugin provides additional optional configuration).
  • If the plugin requires mocked testing, _monkeypatch() was used in its class to apply the necessary decorators.
  • I have dumped the configuration from Django Admin using the dumpplugin command and added it in the project as a data migration. ("How to share a plugin with the community")
  • If a File analyzer was added and it supports a mimetype which is not already supported, you added a sample of that type inside the archive test_files.zip and you added the default tests for that mimetype in test_classes.py.
  • If you created a new analyzer and it is free (does not require API keys), please add it in the FREE_TO_USE_ANALYZERS playbook by following this guide.
  • Check if it could make sense to add that analyzer/connector to other freely available playbooks.
  • I have provided the resulting raw JSON of a finished analysis and a screenshot of the results.
• If external libraries/packages with restrictive licenses were used, they were added in the Legal Notice section.
• Linters (Black, Flake, Isort) gave 0 errors. If you have correctly installed pre-commit, it does these checks and adjustments on your behalf.
• I have added tests for the feature/bug I solved (see tests folder). All the tests (new and old ones) gave 0 errors.
• If changes were made to an existing model/serializer/view, the docs were updated and regenerated (check CONTRIBUTE.md).
• If the GUI has been modified:
  • I have a provided a screenshot of the result in the PR.
  • I have created new frontend tests for the new component or updated existing ones.

Important Rules

• If you miss to compile the Checklist properly, your PR won't be reviewed by the maintainers.
• If your changes decrease the overall tests coverage (you will know after the Codecov CI job is done), you should add the required tests to fix the problem
• Everytime you make changes to the PR and you think the work is done, you should explicitly ask for a review. After being reviewed and received a "change request", you should explicitly ask for a review again once you have made the requested changes.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 1628 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (aa8820f) 66.75% compared to head (e9c96d7) 75.62%.
Report is 1586 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2047      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    66.75%   75.62%   +8.87%     
===========================================
  Files           95      482     +387     
  Lines         3706    14447   +10741     
  Branches       519     1498     +979     
===========================================
+ Hits          2474    10926    +8452     
- Misses         941     2926    +1985     
- Partials       291      595     +304     

Files	Coverage Δ
api_app/analyzers_manager/admin.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
api_app/analyzers_manager/apps.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
api_app/analyzers_manager/constants.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
api_app/analyzers_manager/exceptions.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...app/analyzers_manager/file_analyzers/boxjs_scan.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...pi_app/analyzers_manager/file_analyzers/onenote.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...pi_app/analyzers_manager/file_analyzers/peframe.py	82.35% <100.00%> (ø)
...i_app/analyzers_manager/file_analyzers/rtf_info.py	48.64% <100.00%> (ø)
...s_manager/file_analyzers/xlm_macro_deobfuscator.py	62.50% <100.00%> (ø)
api_app/analyzers_manager/filters.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 237 more

... and 291 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7be36d4...e9c96d7. Read the comment docs.