-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 745
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SYCL][E2E] Refactor check_device_code/group_[load|store].cpp
tests
#16462
[SYCL][E2E] Refactor check_device_code/group_[load|store].cpp
tests
#16462
Conversation
So that `CHECK`s could be re-generated without manual intervention.
To reviewers: I've uploaded this PR as two commits. The final state is fully auto-generated I think reviewing this on per-commit bases will be much easier than do it all at once. |
@intel/llvm-reviewers-runtime , Chris is OOO, can someone else take a look please? It should make downstream pulldowns much smoother. |
Thanks @aelovikov-intel for improving the maintainability ! |
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ | |||
// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --functions "group_load" --include-generated-funcs --version 4 | |||
// NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_cc_test_checks.py | |||
// NOTE: and manually adjusted to follow the related explicit instantiation. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we remove this note if CHECKs are now fully automated
…intel#16462) So that `CHECK`s could be re-generated without manual intervention.
So that
CHECK
s could be re-generated without manual intervention.