Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for Rails 5.1 #94

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 30, 2017
Merged

Support for Rails 5.1 #94

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 30, 2017

Conversation

krasnoukhov
Copy link
Contributor

@krasnoukhov krasnoukhov commented Nov 30, 2017

@krasnoukhov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rmm5t Do we need to test against multiple rvm versions? Does not sound reasonable to me

@rmm5t
Copy link
Member

rmm5t commented Nov 30, 2017

@rmm5t Do we need to test against multiple rvm ruby versions? Does not sound reasonable to me

Yes! Absolutely. What isn't reasonable about that?

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 30, 2017

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling 7542296 on simplepractice:rails5.1 into ** on integrallis:master**.

@krasnoukhov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rmm5t I'm just not sure how this is helpful for this gem. I can understand testing against multiple Ruby versions, but rvm? What does that help to achieve?

@krasnoukhov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rmm5t Oh please nevermind, it's is actually Ruby versions, I just forgot that travis config is a little bit confusing

.travis.yml Outdated
rvm:
- 2.2.7
- 2.3.4

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please don't rip out permutations from the build matrix. These are all here for a reason. If you think a version or permutation should be dropped, that should be reserved for an entirely separate Issue discussion and PR. It's not appropriate to co-opt a PR with something like this.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm sorry about that, I just confused this with actual RVM versions 😆 #94 (comment)

Appraisals Outdated
appraise "rails3.2" do
gem "rails", "~> 3.2.0"
end

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Related. This needs to be put back.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, let me see if I can get it to work. Just FYI, Rails 3.2 isn't really supported by a core team anymore: http://guides.rubyonrails.org/maintenance_policy.html#severe-security-issues

@rmm5t
Copy link
Member

rmm5t commented Nov 30, 2017

I just forgot that travis config is a little bit confusing

Ah, yes, I don't like that Travis designates different ruby versions with with the rvm key either.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 30, 2017

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling 9e1840b on simplepractice:rails5.1 into ** on integrallis:master**.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 30, 2017

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling 9e1840b on simplepractice:rails5.1 into ** on integrallis:master**.

@krasnoukhov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rmm5t All should be fixed now. Rails 3.2 support is also there

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 30, 2017

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling 4bed8b0 on simplepractice:rails5.1 into ** on integrallis:master**.

@krasnoukhov
Copy link
Contributor Author

And the build is green. @rmm5t Please let me know if there's anything else outstanding

@rmm5t rmm5t merged commit b574363 into integrallis:master Nov 30, 2017
@rmm5t
Copy link
Member

rmm5t commented Nov 30, 2017

Good work. Thanks! 🍻

@rmm5t
Copy link
Member

rmm5t commented Nov 30, 2017

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Undefined method deep_symbolize_keys
3 participants