163 more tests for se filtered states

[denisovan31415]

closes #163

[kpagacz]

What do you think about adding tests like this one?

teal/tests/testthat/test-FilterStates.R

Lines 68 to 80 in de11f87

	testthat::test_that("get_call returns a call filtering a data.frame based on a ChoicesFilterState", {
	choices_dataset <- as.data.frame(list(choices = c("a", "b", "c")))
	filter_states <- FilterStates$new(
	input_dataname = "choices_dataset",
	output_dataname = "choices_output",
	datalabel = "label"
	)
	filter_states$queue_initialize(list(ReactiveQueue$new()))
	choices_filter <- ChoicesFilterState$new(x = c("a", "c"), varname = "choices")
	filter_states$queue_push(queue_index = 1, x = choices_filter, element_id = "test")
	eval(isolate(filter_states$get_call()))
	testthat::expect_equal(choices_output, choices_dataset[c(1, 3), , drop = FALSE])
	})

Do you think there is a point to it or should we leave it? SE is quite unique in the sense it contains two queues with filters, so setting it up is a little bit different.

[denisovan31415]

@kpagacz could you check now to see if the tests are adequate?

[kpagacz]

Needs any news?

[gogonzo]

👍 LGTM
No News update is needed - it's not a change from master vs main perspective. It's a part of MAE refactor which has not been released yet