Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhance upgrade dependency runbook #1926

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 9, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Alenar
Copy link
Collaborator

@Alenar Alenar commented Sep 9, 2024

Content

This PR includes several improvements for the upgrade dependencies runbook and its associated script:

  • Add a cargo update step to update the Cargo.lock
  • Enable Nix flake.lock update step as the upgrade incompatibility have been circumvented in Update dependencies for release 2437 #1919
  • Fix the script path being incorrect in the runbook readme.
  • Fix the upgrade script missing the execute permission
  • Fix several typos

Pre-submit checklist

  • Branch
    • Commit sequence broadly makes sense
    • Key commits have useful messages
  • PR
    • Self-reviewed the diff
    • Useful pull request description
    • Reviewer requested
  • Documentation
    • Update README file (if relevant)

Copy link
Member

@jpraynaud jpraynaud left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Collaborator

@dlachaume dlachaume left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🚀

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 9, 2024

Test Results

    4 files  ±0     53 suites  ±0   9m 8s ⏱️ -23s
1 247 tests ±0  1 247 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
1 458 runs  ±0  1 458 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit ac379b1. ± Comparison against base commit 8690abe.

@Alenar Alenar merged commit 0007402 into main Sep 9, 2024
39 checks passed
@Alenar Alenar deleted the djo/enhance-upgrade-dep-run-book branch September 9, 2024 14:56
Copy link
Collaborator

@sfauvel sfauvel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants