Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

return secrets back to original structure #84

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 3, 2024

Conversation

mikemrm
Copy link
Contributor

@mikemrm mikemrm commented Sep 3, 2024

This returns the secrets back to the original config structure however omits secrets from the configmap.

…igmap

Signed-off-by: Mike Mason <mimason@equinix.com>
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (main@11319f1). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #84   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage        ?   9.77%           
======================================
  Files           ?      22           
  Lines           ?     696           
  Branches        ?       0           
======================================
  Hits            ?      68           
  Misses          ?     622           
  Partials        ?       6           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 9.77% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mikemrm mikemrm marked this pull request as ready for review September 3, 2024 20:18
@mikemrm mikemrm requested review from a team as code owners September 3, 2024 20:18
@mikemrm mikemrm merged commit 51cd772 into infratographer:main Sep 3, 2024
4 checks passed
@mikemrm mikemrm deleted the secrets-structure branch September 3, 2024 21:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants