Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport bugfixes for 0.12.2 #6431

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Apr 20, 2016
Merged

Backport bugfixes for 0.12.2 #6431

merged 7 commits into from
Apr 20, 2016

Conversation

jsternberg
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@jsternberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

jsternberg commented Apr 20, 2016

#6419 is the last PR that I want to include in this release. Once that's merged, I'll cherry pick it to this and we can talk about if we're going to merge this for a 0.12.2.

@jwilder

@jwilder
Copy link
Contributor

jwilder commented Apr 20, 2016

👍

if left point is nil in division expr, the influxd server would panic. Now check left point before use it.
@jsternberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jwilder just committed the last of the changes that should be 0.12.2. Are there any others I might be missing before I merge this?

The `percentile()` call previously did not validate that the first
argument was a variable reference and that would let an invalid query
slip by that would panic the query engine.

Added checking for this case and also included test cases for the other
calls that require a variable reference as the first argument.

Fixes #6379.
@jwilder jwilder added this to the 0.12.2 milestone Apr 20, 2016
@jsternberg jsternberg merged commit af57edf into 0.12 Apr 20, 2016
@jsternberg jsternberg deleted the release-0.12.2 branch April 20, 2016 19:04
timhallinflux added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2016
v0.13.0 -- added #6419: Fix panic in transform iterator on division. @thbourlove
v0.12.2 -- #6419 was backported to 0.12.2 as well as PR #6431: Fix panic in transform iterator on division. @thbourlove.  Added.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants