Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft of issues fixed #129

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 16, 2020
Merged

Draft of issues fixed #129

merged 1 commit into from
May 16, 2020

Conversation

idontgetoutmuch
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

CHANGELOG.md Outdated
[26](https://github.com/haskell/random/issues/26) | Add Random instances for tuples |
[44](https://github.com/haskell/random/issues/44) | Add Random instance for Natural |
[51](https://github.com/haskell/random/issues/51) | Very low throughput |
[53](https://github.com/haskell/random/issues/53) | incorrect distribution of randomR for floating-point numbers | Fixed
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
[53](https://github.com/haskell/random/issues/53) | incorrect distribution of randomR for floating-point numbers | Fixed
[53](https://github.com/haskell/random/issues/53) | incorrect distribution of randomR for floating-point numbers | Documented behaviour of floating point numbers

We haven't actually done this yet :) I'll create a PR.

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ooh yes we meant to do it - thanks

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've started writing a little Haddock section for this. I'll create a PR once I have a draft.

Copy link
Collaborator

@curiousleo curiousleo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! I've suggested a few comments to give context / describe how we have fixed various issues.

@idontgetoutmuch
Copy link
Owner Author

I might squash all the commits before making a PR

@idontgetoutmuch idontgetoutmuch marked this pull request as ready for review May 15, 2020 13:45
Copy link
Collaborator

@curiousleo curiousleo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just one Markdown formatting nit - otherwise this is great, thank you!

Edit: I just committed my formatting suggestions to the branch in dd39abb.

@curiousleo
Copy link
Collaborator

I might squash all the commits before making a PR

I think that would be a good idea :)

@idontgetoutmuch idontgetoutmuch merged commit 9cafe3c into v1.2-proposal May 16, 2020
curiousleo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2020
curiousleo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 20, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants