Add Layout operation to Container
#1911
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I can add the |
An operation that will return a message to the application with the dimensions of the widget as a `Rectangle`. `container::get_layout(CONTAINER_ID.clone(), Message::GotLayout)` The only slightly unusual think about this operation is that creating the operation requires the return message. This API is the same as `Command::Perform`, and operations are just `Commands`, so I believe this should be fine.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
An operation that will return a message to the application with the dimensions of the widget as a
Rectangle.container::get_layout(CONTAINER_ID.clone(), Message::GotLayout)The only slightly unusual think about this operation is that creating the operation requires the return message. But this API is the same as
Command::Perform, and operations are justCommands, so I believe this should be fine.