Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix a bug in Raft.Run loop #2606

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 21, 2018
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion edgraph/server.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ func (s *ServerState) initStorage() {
// Write Ahead Log directory
x.Checkf(os.MkdirAll(Config.WALDir, 0700), "Error while creating WAL dir.")
opt := badger.LSMOnlyOptions
opt.ValueLogMaxEntries = 1000 // Allow for easy space reclamation.
opt.ValueLogMaxEntries = 10000 // Allow for easy space reclamation.
opt = setBadgerOptions(opt, Config.WALDir)

glog.Infof("Opening write-ahead log BadgerDB with options: %+v\n", opt)
Expand Down
75 changes: 37 additions & 38 deletions worker/draft.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ type node struct {
*conn.Node

// Fields which are never changed after init.
applyCh chan raftpb.Entry
applyCh chan []raftpb.Entry
ctx context.Context
gid uint32
closer *y.Closer
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ func newNode(store *raftwal.DiskStorage, gid uint32, id uint64, myAddr string) *
gid: gid,
// processConfChange etc are not throttled so some extra delta, so that we don't
// block tick when applyCh is full
applyCh: make(chan raftpb.Entry, Config.NumPendingProposals+1000),
applyCh: make(chan []raftpb.Entry, 100),
elog: trace.NewEventLog("Dgraph", "ApplyCh"),
closer: y.NewCloser(2), // Matches CLOSER:1
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -421,16 +421,27 @@ func (n *node) applyCommitted(proposal *intern.Proposal, index uint64) error {

func (n *node) processApplyCh() {
defer n.closer.Done() // CLOSER:1
for e := range n.applyCh {
proposal := &intern.Proposal{}
if err := proposal.Unmarshal(e.Data); err != nil {
x.Fatalf("Unable to unmarshal proposal: %v %q\n", err, e.Data)
}
for entries := range n.applyCh {
for _, e := range entries {
switch {
case e.Type == raftpb.EntryConfChange:
// Already handled in the main Run loop.
case len(e.Data) == 0:
n.elog.Printf("Found empty data at index: %d", e.Index)
n.Applied.Done(e.Index)
default:
proposal := &intern.Proposal{}
if err := proposal.Unmarshal(e.Data); err != nil {
x.Fatalf("Unable to unmarshal proposal: %v %q\n", err, e.Data)
}

err := n.applyCommitted(proposal, e.Index)
n.elog.Printf("Applied proposal with key: %s, index: %d. Err: %v", proposal.Key, e.Index, err)
n.Proposals.Done(proposal.Key, err)
n.Applied.Done(e.Index)
err := n.applyCommitted(proposal, e.Index)
n.elog.Printf("Applied proposal with key: %s, index: %d. Err: %v",
proposal.Key, e.Index, err)
n.Proposals.Done(proposal.Key, err)
n.Applied.Done(e.Index)
}
}
}
}

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -644,22 +655,27 @@ func (n *node) Run() {
rc := snap.GetContext()
x.AssertTrue(rc.GetGroup() == n.gid)
if rc.Id != n.Id {
// NOTE: Retrieving snapshot here is OK, after storing it above in WAL, because
// rc.Id != n.Id.
x.Printf("-------> SNAPSHOT [%d] from %d\n", n.gid, rc.Id)
// It's ok to block tick while retrieving snapshot, since it's a follower
// We are getting a new snapshot from leader. We need to wait for the applyCh to
// finish applying the updates, otherwise, we'll end up overwriting the data
// from the new snapshot that we retrieved.
maxIndex := n.Applied.LastIndex()
glog.Infof("Waiting for applyCh to reach %d before taking snapshot\n", maxIndex)
n.Applied.WaitForMark(context.Background(), maxIndex)

// It's ok to block ticks while retrieving snapshot, since it's a follower.
glog.Infof("-------> SNAPSHOT [%d] from %d\n", n.gid, rc.Id)
n.retryUntilSuccess(n.retrieveSnapshot, 100*time.Millisecond)
x.Printf("-------> SNAPSHOT [%d]. DONE.\n", n.gid)
glog.Infof("-------> SNAPSHOT [%d]. DONE.\n", n.gid)
} else {
x.Printf("-------> SNAPSHOT [%d] from %d [SELF]. Ignoring.\n", n.gid, rc.Id)
glog.Infof("-------> SNAPSHOT [%d] from %d [SELF]. Ignoring.\n", n.gid, rc.Id)
}
}
if tr != nil {
tr.LazyPrintf("Applied or retrieved snapshot.")
}

// Now schedule or apply committed entries.
for idx, entry := range rd.CommittedEntries {
for _, entry := range rd.CommittedEntries {
// Need applied watermarks for schema mutation also for read linearazibility
// Applied watermarks needs to be emitted as soon as possible sequentially.
// If we emit Mark{4, false} and Mark{4, true} before emitting Mark{3, false}
Expand All @@ -673,28 +689,11 @@ func (n *node) Run() {
// Not present in proposal map.
n.Applied.Done(entry.Index)
groups().triggerMembershipSync()

} else if len(entry.Data) == 0 {
// TODO: Say something. Do something.
tr.LazyPrintf("Found empty data at index: %d", entry.Index)
tr.SetError()
n.Applied.Done(entry.Index)

} else {
// When applyCh fills up, this would automatically block.
// TODO: Instead of sending each entry, we should just send
// the whole array of CommittedEntries. It would avoid
// blocking this loop.
n.applyCh <- entry
}

// Move to debug log later.
// Sometimes after restart there are too many entries to replay, so log so that we
// know Run loop is replaying them.
if tr != nil && idx%5000 == 4999 {
tr.LazyPrintf("Handling committed entries. At idx: [%v]\n", idx)
}
}
// Send the whole lot to applyCh in one go, instead of sending entries one by one.
n.applyCh <- rd.CommittedEntries

if tr != nil {
tr.LazyPrintf("Handled %d committed entries.", len(rd.CommittedEntries))
}
Expand Down