build(deps): upgrade to Typescript v4.4

[Leeyoungone]

Fixes #1129

Signed-off-by: Youngone Lee youngone.lee@accenture.com

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #1384 (039e484) into main (c2cee43) will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 1.60%.

❗ Current head 039e484 differs from pull request most recent head 9a8a643. Consider uploading reports for the commit 9a8a643 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1384      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   68.67%   68.67%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         301      301              
  Lines       10878    10879       +1     
  Branches     1340     1340              
==========================================
  Hits         7471     7471              
- Misses       2709     2710       +1     
  Partials      698      698              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...src/main/typescript/default-consortium-provider.ts	96.15% <0.00%> (ø)
...erver/src/main/typescript/config/config-service.ts	74.15% <0.00%> (-0.85%)	⬇️
...ript/web-services/watch-healthcheck-v1-endpoint.ts	83.33% <0.00%> (ø)
...ctor-stub/web-services/deploy-contract-endpoint.ts	66.66% <0.00%> (ø)
...ctor-stub/web-services/run-transaction-endpoint.ts	84.84% <0.00%> (ø)
...r-stub/web-services/unprotected-action-endpoint.ts	85.29% <0.00%> (ø)
...kages/cactus-common/src/main/typescript/servers.ts	81.81% <0.00%> (ø)
...ript/web-services/register-web-service-endpoint.ts	93.33% <ø> (ø)
...cript/consortium/get-consortium-jws-endpoint-v1.ts	71.79% <0.00%> (ø)
.../typescript/consortium/get-node-jws-endpoint-v1.ts	76.31% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 56 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c2cee43...9a8a643. Read the comment docs.

[Leeyoungone]

@petermetz There are parts of this PR (newly merged Jest test files) that I have't been able to properly write try-catch for but I was wondering if I could open a separate for those migrated files. But for now, the checks are passing and the PR itself is already this big.

[petermetz]

@Leeyoungone Sorry for the slow response, is this the same conversation we had the other day about splitting it up?