Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add polars compatibility #6531

Merged
merged 42 commits into from
Mar 8, 2024
Merged

Conversation

psmyth94
Copy link
Contributor

Hey there,

I've just finished adding support to convert and format to polars.DataFrame. This was in response to the open issue about integrating Polars #3334. Datasets can be switched to Polars format via Dataset.set_format("polars"). I've also included to_polars and from_polars. All polars functions are checked via config.POLARS_AVAILABLE.

A few notes:
This only supports DataFrames and not LazyFrames. This probably could be integrated fairly easily via is_lazy args in set_format, and to_polars.

Let me know your feedbacks.

@lhoestq
Copy link
Member

lhoestq commented Mar 1, 2024

Hi ! thanks for adding polars support :)

You added from_polars in arrow_dataset.py but not to_polars, is this on purpose ?

Also no need to touch table.py imo, which is for arrow-only logic (tables are just wrappers of pyarrow.Table with the exact same methods + optimization to existing methods + separation between in-memory and memory-mapped)

@HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev

The docs for this PR live here. All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update.

@psmyth94 psmyth94 closed this Mar 6, 2024
@psmyth94 psmyth94 reopened this Mar 6, 2024
@psmyth94
Copy link
Contributor Author

psmyth94 commented Mar 7, 2024

Hi @lhoestq, thanks for pointing out the missing to_polars method.

I see your point about table.py so I removed them.

I also added tests in test_arrow_dataset.py, test_dataset_dict.py, and test_formatting.py. Let me know if I am missing any.

Copy link
Member

@lhoestq lhoestq left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks ! Can you addd polars to the test dependencies in setup.py ? This way your tests will be run in the CI

I also added a few more comments:

src/datasets/arrow_dataset.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/datasets/arrow_dataset.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/datasets/arrow_dataset.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@lhoestq lhoestq left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should fix the CI :)

src/datasets/arrow_dataset.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/datasets/arrow_dataset.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
psmyth94 and others added 2 commits March 7, 2024 10:31
Co-authored-by: Quentin Lhoest <42851186+lhoestq@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Quentin Lhoest <42851186+lhoestq@users.noreply.github.com>
setup.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@lhoestq lhoestq left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah our beloved Windows doesn't seem to be properly handled, I added suggestions ti try to fix the Windows CI:

tests/test_arrow_dataset.py Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/test_arrow_dataset.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@psmyth94
Copy link
Contributor Author

psmyth94 commented Mar 8, 2024

duckdb index files were deleted yesterday in dataset_with_script@ref/convert/parquet so I changed the hash to reflect the new SHA.

Copy link
Member

@lhoestq lhoestq left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great ! Merging now, congrats ! 🚀

@lhoestq lhoestq merged commit 90b8961 into huggingface:main Mar 8, 2024
12 checks passed
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 8, 2024

Show benchmarks

PyArrow==8.0.0

Show updated benchmarks!

Benchmark: benchmark_array_xd.json

metric read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence read_batch_unformated after write_array2d read_batch_unformated after write_flattened_sequence read_batch_unformated after write_nested_sequence read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence read_col_unformated after write_array2d read_col_unformated after write_flattened_sequence read_col_unformated after write_nested_sequence read_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d read_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence read_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence read_unformated after write_array2d read_unformated after write_flattened_sequence read_unformated after write_nested_sequence write_array2d write_flattened_sequence write_nested_sequence
new / old (diff) 0.004993 / 0.011353 (-0.006360) 0.003658 / 0.011008 (-0.007350) 0.063868 / 0.038508 (0.025360) 0.030022 / 0.023109 (0.006912) 0.246359 / 0.275898 (-0.029539) 0.273409 / 0.323480 (-0.050070) 0.003091 / 0.007986 (-0.004894) 0.003383 / 0.004328 (-0.000945) 0.050666 / 0.004250 (0.046415) 0.040609 / 0.037052 (0.003557) 0.267250 / 0.258489 (0.008761) 0.289823 / 0.293841 (-0.004018) 0.027635 / 0.128546 (-0.100911) 0.010786 / 0.075646 (-0.064860) 0.208442 / 0.419271 (-0.210830) 0.036627 / 0.043533 (-0.006906) 0.254116 / 0.255139 (-0.001023) 0.274368 / 0.283200 (-0.008832) 0.018222 / 0.141683 (-0.123460) 1.184472 / 1.452155 (-0.267683) 1.194309 / 1.492716 (-0.298407)

Benchmark: benchmark_getitem_100B.json

metric get_batch_of_1024_random_rows get_batch_of_1024_rows get_first_row get_last_row
new / old (diff) 0.092861 / 0.018006 (0.074855) 0.304736 / 0.000490 (0.304246) 0.000219 / 0.000200 (0.000019) 0.000175 / 0.000054 (0.000121)

Benchmark: benchmark_indices_mapping.json

metric select shard shuffle sort train_test_split
new / old (diff) 0.019378 / 0.037411 (-0.018034) 0.062342 / 0.014526 (0.047817) 0.074107 / 0.176557 (-0.102450) 0.121746 / 0.737135 (-0.615390) 0.075657 / 0.296338 (-0.220681)

Benchmark: benchmark_iterating.json

metric read 5000 read 50000 read_batch 50000 10 read_batch 50000 100 read_batch 50000 1000 read_formatted numpy 5000 read_formatted pandas 5000 read_formatted tensorflow 5000 read_formatted torch 5000 read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 10 read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 1000 shuffled read 5000 shuffled read 50000 shuffled read_batch 50000 10 shuffled read_batch 50000 100 shuffled read_batch 50000 1000 shuffled read_formatted numpy 5000 shuffled read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 10 shuffled read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 1000
new / old (diff) 0.286474 / 0.215209 (0.071265) 2.832043 / 2.077655 (0.754389) 1.453520 / 1.504120 (-0.050600) 1.324714 / 1.541195 (-0.216480) 1.335439 / 1.468490 (-0.133051) 0.571753 / 4.584777 (-4.013024) 2.427361 / 3.745712 (-1.318352) 2.899838 / 5.269862 (-2.370024) 1.775754 / 4.565676 (-2.789922) 0.064177 / 0.424275 (-0.360098) 0.004978 / 0.007607 (-0.002629) 0.343585 / 0.226044 (0.117541) 3.368494 / 2.268929 (1.099565) 1.819825 / 55.444624 (-53.624800) 1.502633 / 6.876477 (-5.373844) 1.549182 / 2.142072 (-0.592891) 0.658245 / 4.805227 (-4.146983) 0.120052 / 6.500664 (-6.380612) 0.043051 / 0.075469 (-0.032419)

Benchmark: benchmark_map_filter.json

metric filter map fast-tokenizer batched map identity map identity batched map no-op batched map no-op batched numpy map no-op batched pandas map no-op batched pytorch map no-op batched tensorflow
new / old (diff) 0.977055 / 1.841788 (-0.864733) 11.595567 / 8.074308 (3.521259) 9.450951 / 10.191392 (-0.740441) 0.141060 / 0.680424 (-0.539364) 0.014359 / 0.534201 (-0.519842) 0.289938 / 0.579283 (-0.289345) 0.266035 / 0.434364 (-0.168329) 0.326802 / 0.540337 (-0.213536) 0.431913 / 1.386936 (-0.955023)
PyArrow==latest
Show updated benchmarks!

Benchmark: benchmark_array_xd.json

metric read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence read_batch_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence read_batch_unformated after write_array2d read_batch_unformated after write_flattened_sequence read_batch_unformated after write_nested_sequence read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence read_col_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence read_col_unformated after write_array2d read_col_unformated after write_flattened_sequence read_col_unformated after write_nested_sequence read_formatted_as_numpy after write_array2d read_formatted_as_numpy after write_flattened_sequence read_formatted_as_numpy after write_nested_sequence read_unformated after write_array2d read_unformated after write_flattened_sequence read_unformated after write_nested_sequence write_array2d write_flattened_sequence write_nested_sequence
new / old (diff) 0.005391 / 0.011353 (-0.005961) 0.003724 / 0.011008 (-0.007284) 0.050432 / 0.038508 (0.011924) 0.029904 / 0.023109 (0.006794) 0.270870 / 0.275898 (-0.005028) 0.296773 / 0.323480 (-0.026706) 0.004265 / 0.007986 (-0.003721) 0.002751 / 0.004328 (-0.001577) 0.050366 / 0.004250 (0.046116) 0.046415 / 0.037052 (0.009363) 0.283272 / 0.258489 (0.024783) 0.320188 / 0.293841 (0.026347) 0.029827 / 0.128546 (-0.098719) 0.010736 / 0.075646 (-0.064910) 0.059541 / 0.419271 (-0.359731) 0.057080 / 0.043533 (0.013548) 0.270653 / 0.255139 (0.015514) 0.291235 / 0.283200 (0.008035) 0.018590 / 0.141683 (-0.123093) 1.129402 / 1.452155 (-0.322752) 1.194499 / 1.492716 (-0.298217)

Benchmark: benchmark_getitem_100B.json

metric get_batch_of_1024_random_rows get_batch_of_1024_rows get_first_row get_last_row
new / old (diff) 0.102220 / 0.018006 (0.084214) 0.302176 / 0.000490 (0.301686) 0.000229 / 0.000200 (0.000029) 0.000056 / 0.000054 (0.000002)

Benchmark: benchmark_indices_mapping.json

metric select shard shuffle sort train_test_split
new / old (diff) 0.022809 / 0.037411 (-0.014602) 0.076054 / 0.014526 (0.061528) 0.087466 / 0.176557 (-0.089091) 0.128495 / 0.737135 (-0.608640) 0.089933 / 0.296338 (-0.206406)

Benchmark: benchmark_iterating.json

metric read 5000 read 50000 read_batch 50000 10 read_batch 50000 100 read_batch 50000 1000 read_formatted numpy 5000 read_formatted pandas 5000 read_formatted tensorflow 5000 read_formatted torch 5000 read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 10 read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 1000 shuffled read 5000 shuffled read 50000 shuffled read_batch 50000 10 shuffled read_batch 50000 100 shuffled read_batch 50000 1000 shuffled read_formatted numpy 5000 shuffled read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 10 shuffled read_formatted_batch numpy 5000 1000
new / old (diff) 0.296546 / 0.215209 (0.081337) 2.898693 / 2.077655 (0.821039) 1.605002 / 1.504120 (0.100883) 1.468370 / 1.541195 (-0.072825) 1.503541 / 1.468490 (0.035051) 0.577233 / 4.584777 (-4.007544) 2.460154 / 3.745712 (-1.285558) 2.755651 / 5.269862 (-2.514211) 1.777711 / 4.565676 (-2.787966) 0.063137 / 0.424275 (-0.361138) 0.005056 / 0.007607 (-0.002551) 0.350189 / 0.226044 (0.124145) 3.485473 / 2.268929 (1.216545) 1.952553 / 55.444624 (-53.492072) 1.669108 / 6.876477 (-5.207369) 1.788504 / 2.142072 (-0.353569) 0.672869 / 4.805227 (-4.132359) 0.117717 / 6.500664 (-6.382948) 0.040499 / 0.075469 (-0.034970)

Benchmark: benchmark_map_filter.json

metric filter map fast-tokenizer batched map identity map identity batched map no-op batched map no-op batched numpy map no-op batched pandas map no-op batched pytorch map no-op batched tensorflow
new / old (diff) 1.048187 / 1.841788 (-0.793601) 12.663229 / 8.074308 (4.588921) 10.316487 / 10.191392 (0.125095) 0.142537 / 0.680424 (-0.537887) 0.016024 / 0.534201 (-0.518177) 0.292735 / 0.579283 (-0.286548) 0.273294 / 0.434364 (-0.161069) 0.327636 / 0.540337 (-0.212701) 0.443062 / 1.386936 (-0.943874)

@psmyth94 psmyth94 deleted the add-polars-compatibility branch March 8, 2024 15:59
@lhoestq
Copy link
Member

lhoestq commented Mar 8, 2024

I'm so excited I tweeted about it: https://x.com/qlhoest/status/1766135995513082086?s=20 I hope it's fine !

@psmyth94
Copy link
Contributor Author

psmyth94 commented Mar 8, 2024

Thanks @lhoestq for the support and totally fine with the share! Happy to see people excited for this 😃

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Integrate Polars library
4 participants