You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
When the number of peers changes, the decision node for traces in flight may move to a new node. We should also evaluate spans that are currently stored and re-evaluate if they need to move to a new peer. This will enable cluster size changes to not break telemetry in flight (different decisions causing missing spans in Honeycomb).
Describe the solution you'd like
Describe alternatives you've considered
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
<!--
Thank you for contributing to the project! 💜
Please make sure to:
- Chat with us first if this is a big change
- Open a new issue (or comment on an existing one)
- We want to make sure you don't spend time implementing something we
might have to say No to
- Add unit tests
- Mention any relevant issues in the PR description (e.g. "Fixes#123")
Please see our [OSS process
document](https://github.com/honeycombio/home/blob/main/honeycomb-oss-lifecycle-and-practices.md#)
to get an idea of how we operate.
-->
## Which problem is this PR solving?
Draining incoming and peer queue on peer membership changes
#1258
## Short description of the changes
A `RedistributeNotifier` is introduced in the collector in this PR.
- It's initialized on refinery start up
- When a peer membership change is broadcasted, the notifier immediately
signals the `collect()` goroutine to start the redistribution process
- When multiple peer membership changes happen in a row, it ignores the
signal if there's already a redistribution process running
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
When the number of peers changes, the decision node for traces in flight may move to a new node. We should also evaluate spans that are currently stored and re-evaluate if they need to move to a new peer. This will enable cluster size changes to not break telemetry in flight (different decisions causing missing spans in Honeycomb).
Describe the solution you'd like
Describe alternatives you've considered
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: