-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Address Crownstone review comments #56485
Address Crownstone review comments #56485
Conversation
* Revert property addition, as we would otherwise have to add extra cast statements for every usage of the property. This way the type check knows exactly what type it is.
* These entries shall be added as binary sensors later.
* Use CrownstoneNotFoundError instead of generic KeyError
* Created base class for a Crownstone flow, which has methods used by both config and options flow * Fix step id's * Update tests to set up the integration before starting options flow; This includes a small change to write to hass.data in async_setup_entry, and not in entry_manager.async setup. This avoids having mock all the code in entry_manager.async_setup and we can just mock CrownstoneEntryManager entirely.
Hey there @crownstone, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice!
* Use fixtures for other frequently used patches, and decorate with pytest.mark.usefixtures.
* Test if the integration setup was called in every config flow test. * Use a type alias for fixtures to provide more clarity of what these parameters are.
Thanks Martin, all fixtures yield their mock now and are tested on call count in the tests where they are used. I'm slowly getting more familiar with the pytest toolkit :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great!
Thank you! |
Breaking change
Proposed change
Address the extra review comments by @MartinHjelmare in #50677
I have not found a good way to deal with the use of persistent notification in
entry_manager.py
, line 143. After testing i'm sure that triggering a new flow is not a good idea here. Especially not without any context (notification) why it was triggered.Type of change
Additional information
Checklist
black --fast homeassistant tests
)If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:
If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:
Updated and included derived files by running:
python3 -m script.hassfest
.requirements_all.txt
.Updated by running
python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all
..coveragerc
.The integration reached or maintains the following Integration Quality Scale:
To help with the load of incoming pull requests: