Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

upgrade broadlink library, Use cryptography instead of pycryptodome #24186

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 30, 2019

Conversation

Danielhiversen
Copy link
Member

Description:

upgrade broadlink library, Use cryptography instead of pycryptodome
https://github.com/mjg59/python-broadlink/commits/master

Checklist:

  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • Local tests pass with tox. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
  • There is no commented out code in this PR.
  • I have followed the [development checklist][dev-checklist]

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

  • [The manifest file][manifest-docs] has all fields filled out correctly. Update and include derived files by running python3 -m script.hassfest.
  • New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
  • Untested files have been added to .coveragerc.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 30, 2019

Hey there @Danielhiversen, mind taking a look at this pull request as its been labeled with a integration (broadlink) you are listed as a codeowner for? Thanks!

This is a automatic comment generated by codeowners-mention to help ensure issues and pull requests are seen by the right people.

@amelchio amelchio merged commit 3eebb9d into dev May 30, 2019
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the broadlink_lib_up branch May 30, 2019 11:14
@balloob balloob mentioned this pull request Jun 26, 2019
alandtse pushed a commit to alandtse/home-assistant that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants