Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Simplify network configurations #589

Closed
georgi-l95 opened this issue Apr 22, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #659
Closed

Simplify network configurations #589

georgi-l95 opened this issue Apr 22, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #659
Assignees

Comments

@georgi-l95
Copy link
Member

Proposal to remove previewnet, testnet, mainnet configuration for several reasons:

  1. They are unused from most, if not all users.
  2. It's almost as easier to start with whatever container you want, just by specifying using --network-tag or --mirror-tag or --relay-tag
  3. Because of them, we need to overide env. varibles, which create unnecessery complications when used in CI.
@georgi-l95 georgi-l95 moved this to In Progress in Smart Contract Sprint Board Apr 22, 2024
@georgi-l95 georgi-l95 moved this from In Progress to Sprint BackLog in Smart Contract Sprint Board Apr 22, 2024
@natanasow natanasow self-assigned this Jun 19, 2024
@nistanimirov nistanimirov moved this from Sprint Backlog to Tasks In Progress in Smart Contract Sprint Board Jun 20, 2024
@nistanimirov nistanimirov moved this from Tasks In Progress to In Review in Smart Contract Sprint Board Jun 20, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Review to Done in Smart Contract Sprint Board Jun 20, 2024
@victor-yanev victor-yanev changed the title Proposal: Remove previewnet, testnet, mainnet configuration Remove previewnet, testnet, mainnet configuration Jun 20, 2024
@victor-yanev victor-yanev changed the title Remove previewnet, testnet, mainnet configuration Simplify network configurations Jun 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants