HIP-19 REQUEST – Remove any existing vendors who have not kept to production timescales with a sufficient explanation #268
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Added column for target allocation and difference to example to show all of the variances on a monthly basis.
* add Kerlink HIP19 submission * add HIP25 clarification * add MSRP * update manufacturing information * update social media links Co-authored-by: Benoit Duffez <b.duffez@kerlink.fr>
Tracking issue #134
Co-authored-by: Jamie Wilkinson <jamie@jamiedubs.com>
Co-authored-by: Abhay Kumar <abhay@helium.com> Co-authored-by: Andrew Thompson <andrew@hijacked.us> Co-authored-by: Jamie Wilkinson <jamie@jamiedubs.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thompson <andrew@hijacked.us> Co-authored-by: Abhay Kumar <abhay@helium.com> Co-authored-by: Jamie Wilkinson <jamie@jamiedubs.com>
Linxdot third-party manufacturer application
Signed-off-by: RitchieLi <ritchieli@risinghf.com>
* NetID routing * minor edits * Number as HIP 46 Co-authored-by: Jamie Wilkinson <jamie@jamiedubs.com>
* docs: propose new HIP for IP support * Update front matter, remove boilerplate Co-authored-by: Jamie Dubs <jamie@jamiedubs.com>
|
@jamiew Batch 3 nebra still not delivered you gonna admit they are a scam yet? |
* HIP-42 revision * revision 3
* 0049-display-all-potential-beacon-witnesses.md * Rename to HIP50 and update frontmatter * Add HIP50 to table of contents Co-authored-by: Jamie Wilkinson <jamie@jamiedubs.com>
* 42 - spelling and grammer * fix: grammar * docs: both motivations up front I also re-worded the 'beaconing' aspect to emphasize the real goal: building the Helium network. * fix: clarity * fix: grammar * fix: clarity and grammar
Accidentally removed in eb48de5
Co-authored-by: Abhay Kumar <abhay@opensynapse.net> Co-authored-by: Abhay Kumar <abhay@hackshare.com> Co-authored-by: Jamie Wilkinson <jamie@jamiedubs.com>
Co-authored-by: Jamie Dubs <jamie@jamiedubs.com>
* Update per WNP formula * Update formula again for more clarity * More formatting edits
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We are beginning to encounter a problem now where big promises were made by companies who seemingly do not have the professionalism to handle large scale technology production/distribution and everything that goes with it.
There needs to be 1) Rigid production estimates and timescales that can only be officially extended with a full explanation. 2) Consistent & regular communication. 3) The opportunity for open discussion on the challenges being faced by the community. If the official timescales are not being met without any explanation and none of the above are being done then there should be a vote as to whether their license to produce devices should be extended or removed.