Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AA-1837 add only_invocable_on_unresolved_incidents option to automation actions #158

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 13, 2025

Conversation

juliannagreen1
Copy link
Contributor

Adds new field only_invocable_on_unresolved_incidents to Automation Action's schema.

@juliannagreen1 juliannagreen1 force-pushed the AA-1837 branch 4 times, most recently from 943706e to e096acc Compare October 28, 2024 21:39
@juliannagreen1 juliannagreen1 marked this pull request as ready for review October 29, 2024 20:06
@juliannagreen1
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @heimweh! I have a new addition to the automation action schema. Do you mind taking a look? Thank you!

Copy link
Collaborator

@imjaroiswebdev imjaroiswebdev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @juliannagreen1 please address the comments I left, before moving forward with merging. Thank you

RunnerType *string `json:"runner_type,omitempty"`
CreationTime *string `json:"creation_time,omitempty"`
ModifyTime *string `json:"modify_time,omitempty"`
OnlyInvocableOnUnresolvedIncidents bool `json:"only_invocable_on_unresolved_incidents,omitempty"`
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@juliannagreen1 please remove the omitempty, otherwise, false value won't be sent/received.

@imjaroiswebdev imjaroiswebdev merged commit ce1f94d into heimweh:master Jan 13, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants