Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Attempting a pull request to evaluate GH Actions workflow changes for more unittests #341

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Jul 4, 2023

Conversation

carlhiggs
Copy link
Collaborator

Attempting a pull request to evaluate GH Actions workflow changes for more unittests, as per #337 and #340

carlhiggs and others added 12 commits July 4, 2023 14:31
…o get more advanced unittests to work in GitHub actions, as parallelisation may be causing problems; have to commit to see if this will work!)
attempt to address #340 by restricting max-workers to 1 (attempting to edit online as local commit push failed with alert of limitations of personal access token for editing workflows)
reverting because setting max-workers didn't resolve the issue #340
…ility for test running (ie. without having to run these as subprocesses, in case this helps address #340)
…rhood analysis code that was previously used in debugging)
…onnection); also added failfast=True to help move towards better #340
… of the reference results are saved to the comparison path; suprise! they are identical!)
…parison (cast the reference df to ints, so by rounding there is a difference); as per #340, the sensitivity analysis test is now fast and passes
@carlhiggs carlhiggs merged commit 9026a71 into main Jul 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant