Update Rust crate email_address to v0.2.9

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
email_address	workspace.dependencies	patch	=0.2.5 -> =0.2.9

---

Release Notes

johnstonskj/rust-email_address (email_address)

v0.2.9: Fix Unicode character selection

Compare Source

This release replaces the internal is_uchar function with is_utf8_non_ascii that implements the correct RFC set of Unicode characters.

This fixes issue #​21

Full Changelog: johnstonskj/rust-email_address@v0.2.8...v0.2.9

v0.2.8: Fix missing Eq implementation

Compare Source

PRs to make PartialEq correct lost the implementation of Eq. This caused downstream packages to break, the implementation has been put back.

Fixes issue #​29

Full Changelog: johnstonskj/rust-email_address@v0.2.7...v0.2.8

v0.2.7: Better Option documentation

Compare Source

Added more documentation in general but specifically to the Option type.

Also added builder functions to the same type.

Full Changelog: johnstonskj/rust-email_address@v0.2.6...v0.2.7

v0.2.6

Compare Source

Fixes and merge clean-up

What's Changed

• Serialize directly to string by @​Anders429 in https://github.com/johnstonskj/rust-email_address/pull/27

New Contributors

• @​Anders429 made their first contribution in https://github.com/johnstonskj/rust-email_address/pull/27

Full Changelog: johnstonskj/rust-email_address@v0.2.5...v0.2.6

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 18.12%. Comparing base (89025bc) to head (e90ec16).
Report is 118 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5056      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   18.07%   18.12%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         506      506              
  Lines       16776    16776              
  Branches     2546     2546              
==========================================
+ Hits         3032     3041       +9     
  Misses      13723    13723              
+ Partials       21       12       -9     

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.58% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	1.18% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	55.38% <ø> (+6.92%)	⬆️
local.hash-backend-utils	9.38% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	1.06% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-subgraph	25.22% <ø> (ø)
rust.deer	5.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	70.09% <ø> (ø)
rust.sarif	87.83% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/graph-benches – Integrations

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$51.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 195 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$267 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.61 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-82.648 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$19.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 131 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.540 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$72.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 417 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$25.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 262 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.23 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.95 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.163 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$4.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.38 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.597 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$2.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.424 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$1.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.295 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$1.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.22 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.975 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$1.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.68 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.359 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$3.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}28.2 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.43 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$12.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 132 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.366 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$1.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.93 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.299 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 250 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$16.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 240 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.85 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$17.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 214 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$17.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 197 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.63 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$17.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 203 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 191 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.638 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 216 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.127 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 215 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-22.038 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$16.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 231 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$98.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 470 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.419 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$80.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 451 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.159 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$40.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 250 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.820 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$89.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 489 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.191 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$93.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 441 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.168 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 596 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.440 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$57.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 310 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.356 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$42.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 190 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.65 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$38.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 203 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$48.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 215 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.94 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$52.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 238 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$65.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 327 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.815 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph