Optimize Postgres storage backend LIST function #6546
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tyrannosaurus-becks
previously approved these changes
Apr 9, 2019
kalafut
previously approved these changes
Apr 11, 2019
ncabatoff
dismissed stale reviews from kalafut and tyrannosaurus-becks
via
4091191
ncabatoff
force-pushed
the
postgres-storage-union-all
branch
from
d1e5ee6
to
4091191
Compare
… ALL so as to eliminate the need for a sort/eliminate duplicates step.
ncabatoff
force-pushed
the
postgres-storage-union-all
branch
from
4091191
to
3fd84ea
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since the two branches of the UNION produce disjoint sets, do a UNION ALL so as to eliminate the need for a sort/eliminate duplicates step.