You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment. If the issue is assigned to the "modular-magician" user, it is either in the process of being autogenerated, or is planned to be autogenerated soon. If the issue is assigned to a user, that user is claiming responsibility for the issue. If the issue is assigned to "hashibot", a community member has claimed the issue already.
Description
This comment appears in the iam binding code:
// Creating a binding does not remove existing members if they are not in the provided members list.
// This prevents removing existing permission without the user's knowledge.
// Instead, a diff is shown in that case after creation. Subsequent calls to update will remove any
// existing members not present in the provided list.
It isn't documented, and goes against our idea of TF resources being authoritative. Users can import the binding if they aren't sure what members it contains.
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks!
ghost
locked and limited conversation to collaborators
Feb 4, 2019
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Community Note
Description
This comment appears in the iam binding code:
It isn't documented, and goes against our idea of TF resources being authoritative. Users can import the binding if they aren't sure what members it contains.
New or Affected Resource(s)
References
google_project_iam_binding
does not warn about members who will be removed #2379The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: