Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[New Resource] azurerm_machine_learning_workspace_network_outbound_rule_service_tag #27931

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 8, 2025

Conversation

xuzhang3
Copy link
Contributor

@xuzhang3 xuzhang3 commented Nov 7, 2024

Community Note

  • Please vote on this PR by adding a 👍 reaction to the original PR to help the community and maintainers prioritize for review
  • Please do not leave comments along the lines of "+1", "me too" or "any updates", they generate extra noise for PR followers and do not help prioritize for review

Description

Add support for Machine Learning Workspace Service Tag Network Outbound Rule :

  • FQDN
  • Private Endpoint
  • Service Tag azurerm_machine_learning_workspace_network_outbound_rule_service_tag
=== RUN   TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_update
=== PAUSE TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_update
=== RUN   TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_requiresImport
=== PAUSE TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_requiresImport
=== CONT  TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_basic
=== CONT  TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_requiresImport
=== CONT  TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_update
--- PASS: TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_requiresImport (501.71s)
--- PASS: TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_basic (503.93s)
--- PASS: TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_update (633.45s)
PASS
ok      github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/internal/services/machinelearning       636.420s

PR Checklist

  • I have followed the guidelines in our Contributing Documentation.
  • I have checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change.
  • I have checked if my changes close any open issues. If so please include appropriate closing keywords below.
  • I have updated/added Documentation as required written in a helpful and kind way to assist users that may be unfamiliar with the resource / data source.
  • I have used a meaningful PR title to help maintainers and other users understand this change and help prevent duplicate work.
    For example: “resource_name_here - description of change e.g. adding property new_property_name_here

Changes to existing Resource / Data Source

  • I have added an explanation of what my changes do and why I'd like you to include them (This may be covered by linking to an issue above, but may benefit from additional explanation).
  • I have written new tests for my resource or datasource changes & updated any relevent documentation.
  • I have successfully run tests with my changes locally. If not, please provide details on testing challenges that prevented you running the tests.
  • (For changes that include a state migration only). I have manually tested the migration path between relevant versions of the provider.

Testing

  • My submission includes Test coverage as described in the Contribution Guide and the tests pass. (if this is not possible for any reason, please include details of why you did or could not add test coverage)

Change Log

Below please provide what should go into the changelog (if anything) conforming to the Changelog Format documented here.

  • azurerm_resource - support for the thing1 property [GH-00000]

This is a (please select all that apply):

  • Bug Fix
  • New Feature (ie adding a service, resource, or data source)
  • Enhancement
  • Breaking Change

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #0000

Note

If this PR changes meaningfully during the course of review please update the title and description as required.

@xuzhang3
Copy link
Contributor Author

xuzhang3 commented Nov 7, 2024

image

@xuzhang3 xuzhang3 marked this pull request as ready for review November 7, 2024 06:09
@xuzhang3 xuzhang3 requested review from katbyte and a team as code owners November 7, 2024 06:09
katbyte
katbyte previously requested changes Dec 4, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we have some test failures:
image

@xuzhang3
Copy link
Contributor Author

xuzhang3 commented Dec 5, 2024

Local test passed. The API throttling not happed in my test env. Will retry running the test

= RUN   TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_basic
=== RUN   TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_update
=== PAUSE TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_update
=== RUN   TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_requiresImport
=== PAUSE TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_requiresImport
=== CONT  TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_basic
=== CONT  TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_requiresImport
=== CONT  TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_update
--- PASS: TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_requiresImport (510.05s)
--- PASS: TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_basic (530.12s)
--- PASS: TestAccMachineLearningWorkspaceNetworkOutboundRuleServiceTag_update (603.31s)
PASS
ok      github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/internal/services/machinelearning       606.521s

@xuzhang3
Copy link
Contributor Author

xuzhang3 commented Dec 5, 2024

All tests passed
image

Comment on lines 157 to 159
resource_group {
prevent_deletion_if_contains_resources = false
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should never be set in acceptance tests

Suggested change
resource_group {
prevent_deletion_if_contains_resources = false
}

Copy link
Member

@catriona-m catriona-m left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @xuzhang3 I had a look through this and spotted a few minor things that I commented inline, but once those are fixed up I can take another look. Thanks!


* `protocol` - (Required) Specifies the network protocol. Possible values are `*`, `TCP`, `UDP` and `ICMP`

* `port_ranges` - (Required) Specifies which ports traffic will be allowed by this rule. Provide a single port, such as 80; a port range, such as 1024-655535; or a comma-separated list of single ports and/or port ranges, such as 80,1024-655535. Provide an asterisk(*) to allow traffic on any port.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
* `port_ranges` - (Required) Specifies which ports traffic will be allowed by this rule. Provide a single port, such as 80; a port range, such as 1024-655535; or a comma-separated list of single ports and/or port ranges, such as 80,1024-655535. Provide an asterisk(*) to allow traffic on any port.
* `port_ranges` - (Required) Specifies which ports traffic will be allowed by this rule. You can specify a single port (e.g. ` 80`) , a port range (e.g. `1024-655535`) or a comma-separated list of single ports and/or port ranges(e.g. `80,1024-655535`). `*` can be used to allow traffic on any port.

@xuzhang3
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @xuzhang3 I had a look through this and spotted a few minor things that I commented inline, but once those are fixed up I can take another look. Thanks!

Thanks for reviewing, updated as suggested

Copy link
Member

@catriona-m catriona-m left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @xuzhang3 this is looking good now, however it appears there are some conflicts needing resolved before this can be merged.

Copy link
Member

@stephybun stephybun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @xuzhang3 LGTM 👍

@stephybun stephybun dismissed stale reviews from catriona-m and katbyte January 8, 2025 11:25

Resolved

@stephybun stephybun merged commit 04eefb6 into hashicorp:main Jan 8, 2025
34 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v4.15.0 milestone Jan 8, 2025
stephybun added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2025
jackofallops added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2025
* Update CHANGELOG.md for #28233

* Update for #28215

* Update CHANGELOG.md for #28279

* Update CHANGELOG.md #28269

* Update CHANGELOG.md #27876

* Update CHANGELOG.md #28069

* Update CHANGELOG.md for #28312

* Update CHANGELOG.md for #28278

* Update CHANGELOG.md #28311

* Update CHANGELOG.md undo 28311

* Update CHANGELOG.md #27874

* Update CHANGELOG.md

* Update CHANGELOG for #28352

* Update CHANGELOG.md for #28390

* Update CHANGELOG.md for #28398

* Update CHANGELOG.md for #28425

* Update CHANGELOG.md #28427

* Update CHANGELOG.md #28280

* Update CHANGELOG.md for #28319

* Update CHANGELOG.md #24801

* Update for #28360 #28216 #27830 #28404 #27401 #27122 #27931 #28442

* Update for #28379

* Update CHANGELOG.md for #28281

* Update for #28380

* Update for #27375

* Update for #25695

* Update CHANGELOG.md #27985

* Update CHANGELOG.md - update release date manually until can be scripted

* Update CHANGELOG.md revert date change as script available

* pre-release script updates

---------

Co-authored-by: stephybun <steph@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: catriona-m <86247157+catriona-m@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Wyatt Fry <wyattfry@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: sreallymatt <106555974+sreallymatt@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Matthew Frahry <mbfrahry@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: kt <kt@katbyte.me>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants