Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

azurerm_automation_powershell72_module: support tag property #26106

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 27, 2024

Conversation

wuxu92
Copy link
Contributor

@wuxu92 wuxu92 commented May 27, 2024

Community Note

  • Please vote on this PR by adding a 👍 reaction to the original PR to help the community and maintainers prioritize for review
  • Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for PR followers and do not help prioritize for review

Description

PR Checklist

  • I have followed the guidelines in our Contributing Documentation.
  • I have checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change.
  • I have checked if my changes close any open issues. If so please include appropriate closing keywords below.
  • I have updated/added Documentation as required written in a helpful and kind way to assist users that may be unfamiliar with the resource / data source.
  • I have used a meaningful PR title to help maintainers and other users understand this change and help prevent duplicate work.
    For example: “resource_name_here - description of change e.g. adding property new_property_name_here

Changes to existing Resource / Data Source

  • I have added an explanation of what my changes do and why I'd like you to include them (This may be covered by linking to an issue above, but may benefit from additional explanation).
  • I have written new tests for my resource or datasource changes & updated any relevent documentation.
  • I have successfully run tests with my changes locally. If not, please provide details on testing challenges that prevented you running the tests.
  • (For changes that include a state migration only). I have manually tested the migration path between relevant versions of the provider.

Testing

  • My submission includes Test coverage as described in the Contribution Guide and the tests pass. (if this is not possible for any reason, please include details of why you did or could not add test coverage)
--- PASS: TestAccAutomationPowerShell72Module_complete (361.29s)
PASS

Change Log

Below please provide what should go into the changelog (if anything) conforming to the Changelog Format documented here.

  • azurerm_automation_powershell72_module - support for the tags property

This is a (please select all that apply):

  • Bug Fix
  • New Feature (ie adding a service, resource, or data source)
  • Enhancement
  • Breaking Change

Related Issue(s)

Copy link
Member

@stephybun stephybun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @wuxu92. Could you please address the two comments. Once that's done this should be good to go.

@@ -226,6 +231,7 @@ func (r PowerShell72ModuleResource) Update() sdk.ResourceFunc {
Properties: module.ModuleCreateOrUpdateProperties{
ContentLink: expandPowerShell72ModuleLink(model.ModuleLink),
},
Tags: pointer.To(model.Tags),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should use d.HasChanges("tags") here before adding it to parameters

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated,

@@ -320,6 +326,7 @@ func (r PowerShell72ModuleResource) Read() sdk.ResourceFunc {

output.Name = id.PowerShell72ModuleName
output.AutomationAccountID = module.NewAutomationAccountID(id.SubscriptionId, id.ResourceGroupName, id.AutomationAccountName).ID()
output.Tags = pointer.From(resp.Model.Tags)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Like we do elsewhere for Tags in the read, can we nil check the Model and use the tags.Flatten function.

Suggested change
output.Tags = pointer.From(resp.Model.Tags)
if model := resp.Model; model != nil {
output.Tags = tags.Flatten(model.Tags)
}

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updated,

Copy link
Member

@stephybun stephybun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @wuxu92 LGTM 👍

@stephybun stephybun merged commit ecce5f2 into hashicorp:main May 27, 2024
35 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v3.106.0 milestone May 27, 2024
@wuxu92 wuxu92 deleted the van/ps72 branch June 3, 2024 01:39
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 3, 2024

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 3, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants