Add support for timeouts on aws_eip resource

[ctso]

Adds the ability to override timeouts for the aws_eip resource.

Would be nice to have #3586 along with this change, as we're running into something similar as reported in #3128 but with EIPs instead of security groups.

Open to suggestions on the timeouts here.

[bflad]

LGTM -- thanks! 🚀

14 tests passed (all tests)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSEIP_classic_disassociate
=== RUN   TestAccAWSEIP_disappears
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEIP_disappears (14.59s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSEIP_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEIP_basic (17.49s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSEIP_tags
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEIP_tags (25.75s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSEIP_importVpc
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEIP_importVpc (36.86s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSEIP_network_interface
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEIP_network_interface (43.79s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSEIP_twoEIPsOneNetworkInterface
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEIP_twoEIPsOneNetworkInterface (45.51s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSEIPAssociation_ec2Classic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEIPAssociation_ec2Classic (96.94s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSEIPAssociation_disappears
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEIPAssociation_disappears (131.31s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSEIPAssociation_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEIPAssociation_basic (171.37s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSEIPAssociation_spotInstance
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEIPAssociation_spotInstance (182.10s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSEIP_instance
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEIP_instance (213.75s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSEIP_associated_user_private_ip
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEIP_associated_user_private_ip (240.76s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSEIP_importEc2Classic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEIP_importEc2Classic (248.48s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSEIPAssociate_not_associated
--- PASS: TestAccAWSEIPAssociate_not_associated (273.82s)

[bflad]

This has been released in version 1.12.0 of the AWS provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

[ghost]

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thanks!