resource/wafv2_web_acl: update method params in acctest check

[anGie44]

Community Note

• Please vote on this pull request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original pull request comment to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
• Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for pull request followers and do not help prioritize the request

Release note for CHANGELOG:

resource/wafv2_web_acl: remove extra param in acctest check method updated in #13674

Output from acceptance testing:

--- PASS: TestAccAwsWafv2WebACL_Disappears (82.96s)
--- PASS: TestAccAwsWafv2WebACL_Minimal (118.95s)
--- PASS: TestAccAwsWafv2WebACL_ChangeNameForceNew (209.82s)
--- PASS: TestAccAwsWafv2WebACL_RateBasedStatement (233.68s)
--- PASS: TestAccAwsWafv2WebACL_ManagedRuleGroupStatement (234.70s)
--- PASS: TestAccAwsWafv2WebACL_Basic (239.86s)
--- PASS: TestAccAwsWafv2WebACL_Tags (259.57s)
--- PASS: TestAccAwsWafv2WebACL_RuleGroupReferenceStatement (296.79s)

[pvanbuijtene]

How did this pass the CI tests... I also ran the tests locally without any issue 🤔

[anGie44]

are you referring to the acceptance tests? it may have been the timing, this PR I merged in changed the method signature #13674

[pvanbuijtene]

aah ok, was wondering how I caused this... we don't want failing builds :)

[anGie44]

@pvanbuijtene master is all set for rebasing your PRs that might of been affected by this

[ghost]

This has been released in version 2.67.0 of the Terraform AWS provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template for triage. Thanks!

[ghost]

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thanks!