Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add probes now that expose paths are supported #3096

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 19, 2023
Merged

Conversation

ndhanushkodi
Copy link
Contributor

Changes proposed in this PR:

How I've tested this PR:

How I expect reviewers to test this PR:

Checklist:

@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ func TestMeshInject_MultiportService(t *testing.T) {

helmValues := map[string]string{
"global.experiments[0]": "resource-apis",
"global.image": "ndhanushkodi/consul-dev:expose2",
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can remove this once the change is in the consul image being used here

Copy link
Member

@zalimeni zalimeni Oct 19, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just to save you the time checking: hashicorppreview/consul:1.17-dev and hashicorppreview/consul:1.17.0 were published this AM, so I think you're good!

Copy link
Contributor

@DanStough DanStough left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably a little sus we don't need to make any test changes but the change looks good for now.

@ndhanushkodi
Copy link
Contributor Author

@DanStough oh yeah, so before making fixes in consul, it the multiport pod wouldn't come up with the probes, so I saw it crashloop, and the fact that it came up and the rest of the test could run means probes are working

@DanStough
Copy link
Contributor

I was thinking of the webhook unit test, but I don't think it's a big deal. :shipit:

@ndhanushkodi
Copy link
Contributor Author

@DanStough ahhh got it

@ndhanushkodi ndhanushkodi added backport/1.3.x pr/no-changelog PR does not need a corresponding .changelog entry labels Oct 19, 2023
@DanStough DanStough merged commit 75ed6de into main Oct 19, 2023
46 of 48 checks passed
@DanStough DanStough deleted the nd/fix-expose-paths branch October 19, 2023 21:57
thisisnotashwin pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2023
Co-authored-by: Nitya Dhanushkodi <nitya@hashicorp.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport/1.3.x pr/no-changelog PR does not need a corresponding .changelog entry
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants