feat: automatic update of HederaResponseCodes.sol

[natanasow]

Motivation:

Currently, there is no mechanism for keeping in sync protobufs response codes and these defined in HederaResponseCodes.sol contract.

Implementation:

.github/scripts/hedera-response-codes-protobuf-parser.js

• The most straightforward way of getting protobufs response codes is just parsing .proto file and formatting it as we want. That's a bit overhead when we can get already parsed latest response codes by @hashgraph/proto npm lib. So first step is to obtain all actual response codes.
• Once we get the response codes, we start to build the contract body. It's just a string concatenation so nothing special.
• As you may notice, there are no comments in the generated HederaResponseCodes.sol contract because @hashgraph/proto doesn't return any related comments. The "solution" of that is just adding a disclaimer at the top of the contract pointing out the source of response codes - response_code.proto in the services repo.
• The next step is compiling the contract and making sure the newly created contract is not broken.

.github/workflows/update-hedera-response-codes.yml

• Add a manually triggered GitHub Action to run the script above when we want and not on every release.
• At the end of the action, we create a PR with the newly created contract. That's how would like a PR generated by the action.

Ad-hoc questions: #1219 (comment)

Related issue(s):

Fixes #1219

Notes for reviewer:

Checklist

• Documented (Code comments, README, etc.)
• Tested (unit, integration, etc.)

[github-actions]

Test Results

 17 files  ± 0  101 suites  ±0   25m 23s ⏱️ + 2m 35s
368 tests +18  349 ✅ +22  19 💤 ±0  0 ❌  - 4 
411 runs  ± 0  390 ✅ + 3  21 💤 +1  0 ❌  - 4 

Results for commit 8d6e963. ± Comparison against base commit 7f00646.

This pull request removes 3 and adds 21 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.

"before all" hook for "should NOT be able to use transferFrom on fungible tokens without approval" ‑ TokenTransferContract Test Suite "before all" hook for "should NOT be able to use transferFrom on fungible tokens without approval"
"before all" hook for "should cancel a pending airdrop for a fungible token (FT)" ‑ HIP904 IHRC904Facade ContractTest Suite "before all" hook for "should cancel a pending airdrop for a fungible token (FT)"
"before each" hook for "Should check if an address is another address's operator" ‑ @OZERC1155Token Test Suite "before each" hook for "Should check if an address is another address's operator"

Should NOT allow a non-operator to transfer tokens to another account ‑ @OZERC1155Token Test Suite Should NOT allow a non-operator to transfer tokens to another account
Should NOT burn insufficient amount of token ‑ @OZERC1155Token Test Suite Should NOT burn insufficient amount of token
Should NOT transfer the ownership to another account if the caller is not owner ‑ @OZERC1155Token Test Suite Should NOT transfer the ownership to another account if the caller is not owner
Should allow an operator to transfer a token to another account ‑ @OZERC1155Token Test Suite Should allow an operator to transfer a token to another account
Should allow an operator to transfer tokens in batch to another account ‑ @OZERC1155Token Test Suite Should allow an operator to transfer tokens in batch to another account
Should burn token in batch ‑ @OZERC1155Token Test Suite Should burn token in batch
Should burn token ‑ @OZERC1155Token Test Suite Should burn token
Should check if an address is another address's operator ‑ @OZERC1155Token Test Suite Should check if an address is another address's operator
Should retrieve the token uri of a tokenID ‑ @OZERC1155Token Test Suite Should retrieve the token uri of a tokenID
Should set a new token URI ‑ @OZERC1155Token Test Suite Should set a new token URI
…

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[Ferparishuertas]

LGTM
Added some comments

[acuarica]

Thanks, it's looking good.

[acuarica]

I'm not convinced we should remove the comments. The code names in themselves are not that descriptive. Having comments at least provide a bit more context. This file is "exported" to users (they copy it to their own projects), that's why we should keep comments.

Maybe using another JS proto library?

[quiet-node]

Great work on this! Awesome outcome and can save lots of time updating the contract! Left some suggestions and questions

[acuarica]

looking good

[quiet-node]

Great work! Approve to unblock!

[mishomihov00]

Review applies to .github/workflows/update-hedera-response-codes.yml

[mishomihov00]

Review applies to .github/workflows/update-hedera-response-codes.yml

[acuarica]

Great stuff!

[quiet-node]

LGTM! Fantastic work as always!