[compiler] Add Switch to IR
#13963
Merged
[compiler] Add Switch to IR
#13963
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
danking
reviewed
Nov 1, 2023
|
Would you mind taking a look, Chris? |
Nice idea. I hadn't intended to expose this to python just yet. Using a table to index the cases would be much more powerful! |
chrisvittal
approved these changes
Nov 2, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We have no high-level IR analogue to
CodeBuilderLike.switch. Such a node is useful for flattening the IR in deeply-nestedIfnodes, predicated on integer equality.This partially addresses the stack-overflow error on the
matrix_muluti_write_nothingbenchmark, which currently has a stack-overflow error when computing the type of the CDA.