Update comments.php

[guibranco]

Closes #

📑 Description

✅ Checks

• My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
• My code requires changes to the documentation
• I have updated the documentation as required
• All the tests have passed

☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• No

ℹ Additional Information

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Updated comment URLs to direct users to specific comment sections in GitHub pull requests, enhancing navigation and user experience.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes involve an update to the handleItem function in the Src/comments.php file, specifically modifying the URL format for GitHub comment references. The new format directs users to the specific comment section of a pull request instead of the general comments section. No other modifications to the function's logic or control flow were made.

Changes

File	Change Summary
Src/comments.php	Updated the URL format in the handleItem function to link directly to specific comments on GitHub.

Possibly related PRs

• Update comments.php #633: This PR modifies the handleItem function in Src/comments.php, which is directly related to the changes made in the main PR that also alters the handleItem function in the same file.

Suggested labels

size/XS, ☑️ auto-merge

Suggested reviewers

• gstraccini

🐰 In the code we hop and play,
To link the comments in a better way.
From general to specific, we now direct,
A clearer path for all to connect!
With every change, our code does bloom,
Hopping along, dispelling the gloom! 🌼

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7956e55 and aca340e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• Src/comments.php (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🔇 Additional comments (1)

Src/comments.php (1)

12-12: Improved GitHub comment URL format

The change in the URL format from /comments/ to /#issuecomment- is a good improvement. This new format will direct users to the specific comment within the context of the pull request, providing better navigation and user experience.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[deepsource-io]

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 7956e55..aca340e. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

Analyzer	Status	Summary	Link
Docker	✅ Success		View Check ↗
PHP	✅ Success		View Check ↗
Secrets	✅ Success		View Check ↗
SQL	✅ Success		View Check ↗

---

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

[github-actions]

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

💻 Scan logs

6:30PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
6:30PM INF 562 commits scanned.
6:30PM INF scan completed in 138ms
6:30PM INF no leaks found

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud