Simplify README.md by Removing Badges and Streamlining Content

[guibranco]

User description

Closes #

📑 Description

✅ Checks

• My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
• My code requires changes to the documentation
• I have updated the documentation as required
• All the tests have passed

☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• No

ℹ Additional Information

---

Description

• Updated the README.md to enhance clarity by removing unnecessary deployment and linting badges.
• Focused on providing a concise introduction to the GStraccini-bot.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Documentation	README.md Update README to Simplify Content and Remove Badges            README.md Removed deployment and linting badges from the README. Streamlined the introduction of the GStraccini-bot. +0/-4

---

💡 Penify usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available Penify tools and their descriptions

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Removed outdated badge links for workflow statuses in the README.md file.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes involve the removal of three badge links from the README.md file of the GStraccini-bot project. The badges that were deleted indicate the status of workflows for "Deploy via ftp," "PHP Linting," and "JSON/YAML validation." The overall structure and content of the README remain unchanged, preserving sections about the bot and its functionality.

Changes

File	Change Summary
README.md	Removed badge links for "Deploy via ftp," "PHP Linting," and "JSON/YAML validation."

Poem

In the garden of code where the badges once gleamed,
Three links have departed, or so it has seemed.
The README stands proud, with its tales still to tell,
Of a bot and its magic, all working so well!
🐇✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[penify-dev]

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	1, because the changes are straightforward and involve only the removal of badges and minor content adjustments in the README.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	No
🔒 Security concerns	No

[penify-dev]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Enhancement	Add an installation section to provide guidance for new users Consider adding a section on how to install or use the bot, as this information may be valuable to new users. README.md [5] -5 --- +5 ---\n\n## Installation\n\nFollow these steps to install the GStraccini-bot. Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Adding installation instructions is crucial for user onboarding and significantly improves the documentation's utility for new users.	8
	Refine the remaining content for improved clarity and conciseness Ensure that the remaining content is still clear and concise after the removal of badges, as this may affect the overall readability of the document. README.md [3] -3 🤖 :octocat: **GStraccini-bot** is a GitHub bot designed to keep your repository organized and healthy by automating tasks like managing pull requests, issues, comments, and commits. This allows you to focus on solving real problems. +3 🤖 :octocat: **GStraccini-bot** is a GitHub bot that helps keep your repository organized and healthy by automating tasks such as managing pull requests, issues, comments, and commits, allowing you to focus on solving real problems. Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: The suggestion to refine the content for clarity is valid and addresses potential readability issues, making it a useful enhancement.	7
Maintainability	Suggest a review of the README structure for logical flow and completeness Review the overall structure of the README to ensure that it flows logically and that all necessary information is included after the changes. README.md [6] -6 +6 <!-- Review the structure for logical flow and completeness --> Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: Suggesting a review of the README structure is helpful, but it lacks specificity and does not directly address a clear issue in the current changes.	6
	Add a comment explaining the removal of badges for clarity Consider adding a brief explanation for the removal of badges to provide context for users who may be confused by their absence. README.md [2] -2 +2 <!-- Badges removed for simplification and clarity --> Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: While adding a comment could provide clarity, it does not significantly enhance the document's functionality or address a major issue.	5