Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes GFN-FF bug for specific pi systems #836

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 1, 2023
Merged

Fixes GFN-FF bug for specific pi systems #836

merged 4 commits into from
Aug 1, 2023

Conversation

MtoLStoN
Copy link
Member

Closes #835.

Signed-off-by: MtoLStoN <70513124+MtoLStoN@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: MtoLStoN <70513124+MtoLStoN@users.noreply.github.com>
@MtoLStoN
Copy link
Member Author

This bug also hits a test system. I changed the test accordingly, but we should double-check this before merging.

Copy link
Member

@awvwgk awvwgk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it is more useful to make this check truly informative only without affecting the outcome of the calculation.

@MtoLStoN
Copy link
Member Author

MtoLStoN commented Jul 26, 2023

This would be indeed the case, if the effect on the calculation was not planned. However, I was under the assumption, that the second attempt was the intended option for this particular scenario.

If this is not the case, we can just make sure, that this routine does not overwrite the API variable.

@MtoLStoN MtoLStoN marked this pull request as draft July 26, 2023 20:24
Signed-off-by: MtoLStoN <70513124+MtoLStoN@users.noreply.github.com>
@MtoLStoN
Copy link
Member Author

MtoLStoN commented Jul 31, 2023

After consultation with Stefan Grimme, the effect on the outcome of the calculation seems to be indeed the intended option. However, I changed the fermi temperature to be consistent with the default case.

This is therefore ready to be merged now.

@MtoLStoN MtoLStoN marked this pull request as ready for review July 31, 2023 09:45
@MtoLStoN MtoLStoN requested a review from awvwgk July 31, 2023 09:46
Signed-off-by: MtoLStoN <70513124+MtoLStoN@users.noreply.github.com>
@MtoLStoN MtoLStoN merged commit 9b24033 into main Aug 1, 2023
15 of 17 checks passed
@MtoLStoN MtoLStoN deleted the gfnff_bug branch August 1, 2023 11:44
marcelmbn pushed a commit to marcelmbn/xtb that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2023
* Fixes GFN-FF bug for specific pi systems

Signed-off-by: MtoLStoN <70513124+MtoLStoN@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: MtoLStoN <70513124+MtoLStoN@users.noreply.github.com>
gorges97 pushed a commit to gorges97/xtb that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2024
* Fixes GFN-FF bug for specific pi systems

Signed-off-by: MtoLStoN <70513124+MtoLStoN@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: MtoLStoN <70513124+MtoLStoN@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Gorges <58849467+gorges97@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Different single-point GFN-FF energy with and without argument --verbose
2 participants