Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Generalized alpha #781

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 24, 2022
Merged

Generalized alpha #781

merged 5 commits into from
May 24, 2022

Conversation

oriolcg
Copy link
Member

@oriolcg oriolcg commented May 3, 2022

Generalized-alpha method for 1s order ODEs

@oriolcg oriolcg added the enhancement New feature or request label May 3, 2022
@oriolcg oriolcg self-assigned this May 3, 2022
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 3, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #781 (60f1be7) into master (447d58e) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 84.61%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #781      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.24%   88.23%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         156      157       +1     
  Lines       17311    17363      +52     
==========================================
+ Hits        15276    15320      +44     
- Misses       2035     2043       +8     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/ODEs/ODETools/ODESolvers.jl 77.77% <ø> (ø)
src/ODEs/ODETools/ODETools.jl 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/ODEs/TransientFETools/ODEOperatorInterfaces.jl 94.54% <0.00%> (-5.46%) ⬇️
src/ODEs/ODETools/GeneralizedAlpha.jl 89.79% <89.79%> (ø)

📣 Codecov can now indicate which changes are the most critical in Pull Requests. Learn more

@santiagobadia santiagobadia merged commit d464956 into master May 24, 2022
@santiagobadia santiagobadia deleted the generalized_alpha branch May 24, 2022 11:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants