Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for nested package.json checking #308

Closed
StephanBijzitter opened this issue Oct 5, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

Add support for nested package.json checking #308

StephanBijzitter opened this issue Oct 5, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@StephanBijzitter
Copy link

StephanBijzitter commented Oct 5, 2016

Hello!

We've recently started using Greenkeeper to keep our private NPM repository up to date, but the effect is limited because we have a structure that is designed to limit maintenance to a minimum.

The root of our project contains a package file with developer dependencies, that are used by all (or a large majority) of our NPM modules. The modules themselves are in a directory called modules.

This means we have package files in the following directories:

  • root/package.json
  • root/modules/module-a/package.json
  • root/modules/module-b/package.json
  • et cetera

Currently, Greenkeeper only checks the first package file in the root. I would hereby like to request a configuration option to scan a glob for package files, making the location(s) completely customizable.

I have not yet taken a look at the code, but if you think a third party could implement this, I would be able to get our management to give this more priority, allowing us to create this feature. If that's the case and you already have an idea of where this should be implemented, please do provide us some filenames.

@rkuykendall
Copy link

rkuykendall commented Oct 5, 2016

This appears to be a duplicate of issue #139. If so, you should 👍 that issue and comment with any information you think is helpful.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants