Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Maintainers Needed #247

Open
greena13 opened this issue Oct 20, 2019 · 11 comments
Open

New Maintainers Needed #247

greena13 opened this issue Oct 20, 2019 · 11 comments

Comments

@greena13
Copy link
Owner

Hi all,

I have not had as much time as I'd like to work on this library in recent months and it is looking to be a similar situation for at least the next few months. Meanwhile, the issues continue to pile up.

I'm looking for some assistance in helping to investigate and solve outstanding issues with the project. I'm hoping to be available to support and guide fellow contributors, to point them in the right direction and explain high-level concepts.

@mayank23
Copy link

Hi @greena13 my team is using react-hotkeys and if possible I would like to help maintain

@greena13
Copy link
Owner Author

greena13 commented Jan 1, 2020

Hi @mayank23, apologies for the (significant) delay in getting back to you. I'll be looking to move on maintenance of this package this year to any interested party, so I am no longer the bottleneck for addressing the many outstanding issues.

Are you still interested and have the resources to help out?

Thanks. I will be proactive in keeping an eye on this thread, so it won't be months before getting back to you, again.

@ZYinMD
Copy link

ZYinMD commented Apr 3, 2020

@greena13 I suggest changing the beginning of README a little bit.

I think a "looking for maintainers" section in the beginning of README has a negative effect of pushing new users away, because they'd think "this package is abandoned, let's not try it", it'd be better to change the beginning of README into:

===================

v1.x vs v2:

If you only need some basic usage of hotkeys, you can use v1.1.4. It is very stable. For documentation of v1.x, see here.

Upgrading from 1.x ?

If you need the advanced features provided in v2, see the upgrade notes.

V2 is looking for maintainers:

We are is search of new maintainers to help address issues in v2. If you are interested in helping out in any capacity, please get in touch.

===================

This way new users who just found this package will be much less likely to go away.

@burtonator
Copy link

We're going to need a new maintainer apparently ;)

@burtonator
Copy link

... or an intermediate strategy and maybe someone can fork and start merging PRs?

@burtonator
Copy link

No disrespect to @greena13 implied - I'm sure he's busy... but we should consider an official fork for this. Lots of bugs an PRs are outstanding here

@joepsyko
Copy link

any news on this?

@fynncfchen
Copy link

Hey I'm a heavy user of this library, still need a new maintainer here?

@aeksco
Copy link

aeksco commented Nov 21, 2021

I'm also interested in lending a hand - I use this package in several personal + professional projects and would like to help on the maintenance front if I can. I've secured the react-hotkeys GitHub organization - it might make sense to relocate the repository into a space where multiple maintainers could work in parallel to ensure that this repo stays alive and well.

Perhaps it would make sense to organize a call for interested parties?

@tstirrat15
Copy link

I like that idea. I haven't seen another library that I like as much as this one, and I'd hate to see it die. Any way I can help push it along?

@romellem
Copy link

If react-hotkeys is effectively abandoned, are there any good forks or alternatives that people recommend?

Love the library by the way, hopefully this can be brought back, but no worries if it doesn't. Thanks for all the work!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants