Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update eval language around conditional comparison again #1257

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 8, 2024

Conversation

david-fritz-gravwell
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@kris-watts-gravwell kris-watts-gravwell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we need to explicitly define what a type check is and provide an example. Most people have no idea what "a type check" is.

And realistically they shouldn't be doing type checks. They should be doing type casts and building effective comparisons where a type casts failure still behaves correctly

Copy link
Contributor

@kris-watts-gravwell kris-watts-gravwell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ashnwade ashnwade merged commit b47e10a into gravwell:next-patch Nov 8, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants