Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
kafka replay speed: add bytes limit for inflight fetch requests #9892
kafka replay speed: add bytes limit for inflight fetch requests #9892
Changes from all commits
c46a15a
df46224
9e647e6
a6c2e02
1584dea
28a6040
82ccf10
eb90541
8f96769
5b0021a
13bff6e
dd2b9ce
3c6e61f
8f2cf6e
8484b58
009d0b8
47f2827
65b3769
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We've lost this
if
check (removeNextResult
assumes the list is non empty). Is it a problem?To my understanding it's not a problem because, with the new logic, we have the guarantee that if
refillBufferedResult
is valued that there's at least 1 item in the list (the fetch we're currently reading from, which is set torefillBufferedResult
itself). Is my understanding correct?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
that's right. Now instead of keeping
nextResult
as state we compute it on every iteration. The invariants from before still hold