-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 810
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add parametric host address #3111
Conversation
Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA). View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information. For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request. |
4646302
to
f5c97f2
Compare
Build Succeeded 👏 Build Id: 2502e708-7352-4310-a7c2-a76bacf455d6 The following development artifacts have been built, and will exist for the next 30 days:
A preview of the website (the last 30 builds are retained): To install this version:
|
Hi! Thanks for your contribution! As indicated in #3111 (comment), we need a signed CLA to accept this - thanks! |
Build Succeeded 👏 Build Id: 6150ddcc-d152-401a-9b28-5285ba44f07b The following development artifacts have been built, and will exist for the next 30 days:
A preview of the website (the last 30 builds are retained): To install this version:
|
This keeps coming up with a few SDKs - at this point, we should probably just allow it though. As a review item - this change should also be documented please. |
Self::new_internal(addr, keep_alive).await | ||
} | ||
|
||
pub async fn new_with_host( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🤔 should this be wrapped in new
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I added a new method to not break the existing API, but I'd rather have just one method new
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since it has a default that is backward compatible, I think it's fine to have just the new
method? Unless I am missing something in the details?
Build Failed 😱 Build Id: 26575ef6-a563-494a-b57b-31a88a674e8f To get permission to view the Cloud Build view, join the agones-discuss Google Group. |
Build Failed 😱 Build Id: 1aa104d1-be5e-4ade-bfc3-57d7e837e5f0 To get permission to view the Cloud Build view, join the agones-discuss Google Group. |
Build Succeeded 👏 Build Id: 18912702-d482-4b54-aec3-d40340b4594e The following development artifacts have been built, and will exist for the next 30 days:
A preview of the website (the last 30 builds are retained): To install this version:
|
Build Failed 😱 Build Id: 4f094373-be99-4b2c-b3ea-af11c6a410a6 To get permission to view the Cloud Build view, join the agones-discuss Google Group. |
OIC - the new method was not backward compatible - sorry, I missed that. So I see the error now in our sdk conformance tests:
So yeah - two methods may be the better option - sorry about that. I thought it was just using the env vars, I missed the arguments that got passed in. |
Bump. |
@MiniaczQ @markmandel is OoO right now - I will see if we have anyone else comfortable approving a Rust PR. |
Build Failed 😱 Build Id: bb7cc211-50d7-4e0a-b1a2-d9e1a0e921ed To get permission to view the Cloud Build view, join the agones-discuss Google Group. |
Build Succeeded 👏 Build Id: 8738104f-d9d8-4ee4-a13d-0d615daf2ced The following development artifacts have been built, and will exist for the next 30 days:
A preview of the website (the last 30 builds are retained): To install this version:
|
Build Failed 😱 Build Id: 491eff51-d173-4b4d-8cf2-5a7af69c109f To get permission to view the Cloud Build view, join the agones-discuss Google Group. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: MiniaczQ, zmerlynn The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Build Succeeded 👏 Build Id: d95d4b94-c379-43c3-990f-a98bb82645ce The following development artifacts have been built, and will exist for the next 30 days:
A preview of the website (the last 30 builds are retained): To install this version:
|
Currently it's only possible to set the port, which is problematic when testing in docker.
This PR replaces the parametric port to URL.