Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind to v2.13.4.2 [security] #94

Conversation

lqiu96
Copy link
Contributor

@lqiu96 lqiu96 commented Apr 3, 2023

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind (source) compile patch 2.13.2.1 -> 2.13.4.2

⚠ Dependency Lookup Warnings ⚠

Warnings were logged while processing this repo. Please check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

GitHub Vulnerability Alerts

CVE-2022-42004

In FasterXML jackson-databind before 2.12.7.1 and in 2.13.x before 2.13.4, resource exhaustion can occur because of a lack of a check in BeanDeserializer._deserializeFromArray to prevent use of deeply nested arrays. An application is vulnerable only with certain customized choices for deserialization.

CVE-2022-42003

In FasterXML jackson-databind 2.4.0-rc1 until 2.12.7.1 and in 2.13.x before 2.13.4.2 resource exhaustion can occur because of a lack of a check in primitive value deserializers to avoid deep wrapper array nesting, when the UNWRAP_SINGLE_VALUE_ARRAYS feature is enabled. This was patched in 2.12.7.1, 2.13.4.2, and 2.14.0.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@lqiu96 lqiu96 requested review from a team as code owners April 3, 2023 15:23
@vchudnov-g vchudnov-g added the automerge Merge the pull request once unit tests and other checks pass. label Jan 18, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Merge-on-green attempted to merge your PR for 6 hours, but it was not mergeable because either one of your required status checks failed, one of your required reviews was not approved, or there is a do not merge label. Learn more about your required status checks here: https://help.github.com/en/github/administering-a-repository/enabling-required-status-checks. You can remove and reapply the label to re-run the bot.

@gcf-merge-on-green gcf-merge-on-green bot removed the automerge Merge the pull request once unit tests and other checks pass. label Jan 18, 2024
@vchudnov-g vchudnov-g added the automerge Merge the pull request once unit tests and other checks pass. label Feb 6, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Merge-on-green attempted to merge your PR for 6 hours, but it was not mergeable because either one of your required status checks failed, one of your required reviews was not approved, or there is a do not merge label. Learn more about your required status checks here: https://help.github.com/en/github/administering-a-repository/enabling-required-status-checks. You can remove and reapply the label to re-run the bot.

@gcf-merge-on-green gcf-merge-on-green bot removed the automerge Merge the pull request once unit tests and other checks pass. label Feb 7, 2024
@vchudnov-g vchudnov-g added the automerge Merge the pull request once unit tests and other checks pass. label Feb 20, 2024
@vchudnov-g vchudnov-g merged commit 394368f into main Feb 20, 2024
5 checks passed
@vchudnov-g vchudnov-g deleted the renovate/maven-com.fasterxml.jackson.core-jackson-databind-vulnerability branch February 20, 2024 22:21
@gcf-merge-on-green gcf-merge-on-green bot removed the automerge Merge the pull request once unit tests and other checks pass. label Feb 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants