Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Material Components' relationship with MDL #5022

Open
rystraum opened this issue Jan 29, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Material Components' relationship with MDL #5022

rystraum opened this issue Jan 29, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@rystraum
Copy link
Contributor

Reading through multiple issues here in MDL repo eventually lead me to Material Components.

In addition, I just read that MDL is no longer in active development (as per the default Issue placeholder) but all v2 repos in the issue placeholder no longer exists.

While Material Components repo states that it is the successor to MDL, no statement in MDL repo corroborates this claim. I looked over the README.md, the Wiki and CONTRIBUTING.md.

I would just like to ask for verification that Material Components indeed supersede MDL so I can start following that repo and use that instead.

Thank you.

@Garbee
Copy link
Collaborator

Garbee commented Jan 29, 2017

Duplicate of #4984 and #4985.

Yes, MCW is the successor to MDL. We don't have everything updated yet as it is still in Alpha stages. Very early and we can decide to change anything in it at any moment. Only use it if you accept that risk within your projects.

We would absolutely love to have people testing MCW though and providing feedback about their experiences using it, especially integrating with other frameworks and libraries.

rystraum added a commit to rystraum/material-design-lite that referenced this issue Jan 30, 2017
@thomassross
Copy link

Hi,

Do you need nodejs in order to compile/use MCW?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants