Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add flag for skipping javadoc formatting #149

Closed

Conversation

Kurt-Bonatz
Copy link

Adds the command line flag --skip-javadoc-formatting to enable
skipping javadoc formatting. Only the HTML formatting of javadoc is
skipped, not things like fixing indentation, missing asterisks and
trimming. This commit does not attempt to solve issues that arise when
using other formatting standards, simply just to preserve the text
inside of the javadoc. For examples, see the tests added to
JavadocFormattingTest.

Issue: #139

Adds the command line flag `--skip-javadoc-formatting` to enable
skipping javadoc formatting. Only the HTML formatting of javadoc is
skipped, not things like fixing indentation, missing asterisks and
trimming. This commit does not attempt to solve issues that arise when
using other formatting standards, simply just to preserve the text
inside of the javadoc. For examples, see the tests added to
JavadocFormattingTest.

Issue: google#139
@googlebot
Copy link

We found a Contributor License Agreement for you (the sender of this pull request), but were unable to find agreements for the commit author(s). If you authored these, maybe you used a different email address in the git commits than was used to sign the CLA (login here to double check)? If these were authored by someone else, then they will need to sign a CLA as well, and confirm that they're okay with these being contributed to Google.

@Kurt-Bonatz
Copy link
Author

I have signed the CLA

@googlebot
Copy link

CLAs look good, thanks!

@googlebot googlebot added cla: yes and removed cla: no labels May 6, 2017
Ran the autoformatter over the prior changes to keep style in line with
the rest of the code base. Also changed from JavaDoc to Javadoc to also
reflect pre-existing code.
@cpovirk cpovirk mentioned this pull request Nov 12, 2019
cpovirk pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2019
Fixes #139, #149

-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=279811849
cpovirk pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2019
Fixes #139, #149

-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=279811849
@cushon
Copy link
Collaborator

cushon commented Dec 19, 2019

#418

@cushon cushon closed this Dec 19, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants