Skip to content

Conversation

claystation
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #3714

Copy link
Collaborator

@gmlewis gmlewis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, @claystation!
One minor tweak, please, otherwise LGTM.

Note that I still don't have write access to this repo, but figure I might as well attempt to catch up on my code reviews (which I usually allow the linter to process first... ah, well).

@claystation
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gmlewis no rush. Hope you get access back soon enough!

@claystation claystation requested a review from gmlewis September 19, 2025 07:39
Copy link
Collaborator

@gmlewis gmlewis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, @claystation!
LGTM.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 22, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.08%. Comparing base (f137c94) to head (484d81c).
⚠️ Report is 9 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3719   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.08%   91.08%           
=======================================
  Files         187      187           
  Lines       16581    16581           
=======================================
  Hits        15103    15103           
  Misses       1293     1293           
  Partials      185      185           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@gmlewis gmlewis merged commit 929058e into google:master Sep 22, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add support for ruleset exempt bypass
2 participants