Update Sora #5827

emmamarichal · 2023-01-25T14:43:35Z

Font Project Git Repo URL:
https://github.com/sora-xor/sora-font

Current version:
Version 2.000 https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Sora?query=sora

New available version:
Version number not updated on the repo

Super short description of the upgrade:

expand style (italic added)
bug fix

Bugs reported in this repo which this upgrade would fix:
sora-xor/sora-font#21
sora-xor/sora-font#20
sora-xor/sora-font#19
sora-xor/sora-font#17
sora-xor/sora-font#16
sora-xor/sora-font#14

this issue isn't really solved: #4898

emmamarichal · 2023-01-25T14:50:54Z

Hi @tarmovannas! I'm Emma and I work with the GoogleFonts team as font engineer.
I was investigating an issue (#4898), and I saw that you had added italic in the repo. Would you be ok to update Sora on Google Fonts?

tarmovannas · 2023-01-25T15:32:08Z

Thanks @emmamarichal. That would be great, but we should slightly fix the italics first. Also we planned to create Cyrillics. So we need a type designer / font engineer to help with this. Let me tag @WRRicht3r here, and he can explain further.

emmamarichal · 2023-01-25T15:33:43Z

No rush, just let me know here when it's ready :)

WRRicht3r · 2023-01-25T15:35:02Z

Hi @emmamarichal , this is William from the SORA team, unfortunately, we were in the process of working on this implementation but got ghosted by the type designer who was going to help us, therefore we are unable to make these updates at the moment.
The scope of his work also included Cyrillics. If you are available to help us, could we discuss a possible proposal?

emmamarichal · 2023-01-25T15:43:08Z

Hi @WRRicht3r Unfortunately I'm not sure I have the skills to develop Cyrillic. But we can release the italic first, and take care of the cyrillic when it's done, that gives you time to find someone else to work on it. What do you think?

cc @davelab6

WRRicht3r · 2023-01-25T15:51:17Z

Hello @emmamarichal help with the italics would be great! Please let us know how we can proceed with this.
Thanks!

cc @tarmovannas

emmamarichal · 2023-01-25T15:57:44Z

For the italic, my job is to fix the possible errors detected through our QA (so that the fonts follow the Google Fonts specs), this is rather engineering. For the design, you'll have to provide me with a "finished" file, that follows the GF glyphset. I couldn't open the Glyphs italic file, -I don't know why- but the italic seemed to be already well advanced, no?

WRRicht3r · 2023-01-26T12:57:05Z

Hello @emmamarichal at the moment, the version of italics we have are available here and here
Please let me know if this is what you're looking for.

cc @tarmovannas

emmamarichal · 2023-01-26T13:13:02Z

Hi @WRRicht3r,

I just run a fontbakery on the exported fonts. It looks good, I can solve the fails quickly. The only thing is I can't access to the file. Do you think you can solve that?

Fontbakery report

Fontbakery version: 0.8.10

[2] Family checks

ℹ INFO: Check axis ordering on the STAT table. (com.google.fonts/check/STAT/axis_order)

ℹ INFO From a total of 2 font files, 0 of them (0.00%) lack a STAT table.

And these are the most common STAT axis orderings:
('wght', 2) [code: summary]

⚠ WARN: Make sure all font files have the same version value. (com.google.fonts/check/family/equal_font_versions)

⚠ WARN Version info differs among font files of the same font project.
These were the version values found:
Sora-Italic[wght].ttf: 1.0
Sora[wght].ttf: 2.0
[code: mismatch]

[27] Sora-Italic[wght].ttf

🔥 FAIL: Checking file is named canonically. (com.google.fonts/check/canonical_filename)

🔥 FAIL Expected "Sora[wght].ttf. Got Sora-Italic[wght].ttf. [code: bad-filename]

🔥 FAIL: Checking OS/2 fsType does not impose restrictions. (com.google.fonts/check/fstype)

🔥 FAIL In this font fsType is set to 4 meaning that:
The font may be embedded, and temporarily loaded on the remote system, but documents that use it must not be editable.

No such DRM restrictions can be enabled on the Google Fonts collection, so the fsType field must be set to zero (Installable Embedding) instead. [code: drm]

🔥 FAIL: Check Google Fonts glyph coverage. (com.google.fonts/check/glyph_coverage)

🔥 FAIL Missing required codepoints:
- 0x02D9 (DOT ABOVE)
- 0x0132 (LATIN CAPITAL LIGATURE IJ)
- 0x0133 (LATIN SMALL LIGATURE IJ)
- 0x02DD (DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT)
- 0x02C7 (CARON)
- 0x02D8 (BREVE)
- And 0x02DB (OGONEK)
  [code: missing-codepoints]

🔥 FAIL: Is the Grid-fitting and Scan-conversion Procedure ('gasp') table set to optimize rendering? (com.google.fonts/check/gasp)

🔥 FAIL Font is missing the 'gasp' table. Try exporting the font with autohinting enabled.
If you are dealing with an unhinted font, it can be fixed by running the fonts through the command 'gftools fix-nonhinting'
GFTools is available at https://pypi.org/project/gftools/ [code: lacks-gasp]

🔥 FAIL: Check glyphs do not have components which are themselves components. (com.google.fonts/check/glyf_nested_components)

🔥 FAIL The following glyphs have components which themselves are component glyphs:
- Adieresis
- Dcroat
- Edieresis
- Idieresis
- Odieresis
- Udieresis
- Wdieresis
- Ydieresis
- Idieresis.salt
- adieresis and 24 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-nested-components]

🔥 FAIL: Font enables smart dropout control in "prep" table instructions? (com.google.fonts/check/smart_dropout)

🔥 FAIL The 'prep' table does not contain TrueType instructions enabling smart dropout control. To fix, export the font with autohinting enabled, or run ttfautohint on the font, or run the gftools fix-nonhinting script. [code: lacks-smart-dropout]

🔥 FAIL: Check a font's STAT table contains compulsory Axis Values. (com.google.fonts/check/STAT)

🔥 FAIL Compulsory STAT Axis Values are incorrect:

Name	Axis	Current Value	Current Flags	Current LinkedValue	Expected Value	Expected Flags	Expected LinkedValue
Thin	wght	100.0	0	None	100.0	0	None
ExtraLight	wght	N/A	N/A	N/A	200.0	0	None
Light	wght	N/A	N/A	N/A	300.0	0	None
Regular	wght	400.0	2	None	400.0	2	700.0
Medium	wght	N/A	N/A	N/A	500.0	0	None
SemiBold	wght	N/A	N/A	N/A	600.0	0	None
Bold	wght	N/A	N/A	N/A	700.0	0	None
ExtraBold	wght	800.0	0	None	800.0	0	None
[code: bad-axis-values]

🔥 FAIL: Check variable font instances (com.google.fonts/check/fvar_instances)

🔥 FAIL fvar instances are incorrect:

Add missing instances
Delete additional instances

Name	current	expected
Thin Italic	wght=100.0	N/A
SemiBold Italic	wght=600.0	N/A
ExtraBold Italic	wght=800.0	N/A
ExtraLight Italic	wght=200.0	N/A
Medium Italic	wght=500.0	N/A
Light Italic	wght=300.0	N/A
Bold Italic	wght=700.0	N/A
Italic	wght=400.0	N/A
Thin	N/A	wght=100.0
ExtraLight	N/A	wght=200.0
Light	N/A	wght=300.0
Regular	N/A	wght=400.0
Medium	N/A	wght=500.0
SemiBold	N/A	wght=600.0
Bold	N/A	wght=700.0
ExtraBold	N/A	wght=800.0

🔥 FAIL: Ensure component transforms do not perform scaling or rotation. (com.google.fonts/check/transformed_components)

🔥 FAIL The following glyphs had components with scaling or rotation
or inverted outline direction:
exclamdown (component exclam)
exclamdown.case (component exclam)
parenright (component parenleft)
braceright (component braceleft)
bracketright (component bracketleft)
parenright.case (component parenleft.case)
braceright.case (component braceleft.case)
bracketright.case (component bracketleft.case)
[code: transformed-components]

🔥 FAIL: Validates that when an instance record is included for the default instance, its subfamilyNameID value is set to either 2 or 17 (or something with the same value as 2), and its postScriptNameID value is set to 6 (or something with the same value as 6). (com.adobe.fonts/check/varfont/valid_default_instance_nameids)

🔥 FAIL 'Italic' instance has the same coordinates as the default instance; its subfamily name should be 'Regular' [code: invalid-default-instance-subfamily-nameid:264]

🔥 FAIL: STAT table has Axis Value tables? (com.adobe.fonts/check/stat_has_axis_value_tables)

🔥 FAIL STAT table is missing Axis Value for 'wght' value '200.0' [code: missing-axis-value-table]
🔥 FAIL STAT table is missing Axis Value for 'wght' value '300.0' [code: missing-axis-value-table]
🔥 FAIL STAT table is missing Axis Value for 'wght' value '500.0' [code: missing-axis-value-table]
🔥 FAIL STAT table is missing Axis Value for 'wght' value '600.0' [code: missing-axis-value-table]
🔥 FAIL STAT table is missing Axis Value for 'wght' value '700.0' [code: missing-axis-value-table]

⚠ WARN: Checking OS/2 achVendID. (com.google.fonts/check/vendor_id)

⚠ WARN OS/2 VendorID value ' ' is not yet recognized. If you registered it recently, then it's safe to ignore this warning message. Otherwise, you should set it to your own unique 4 character code, and register it with Microsoft at https://www.microsoft.com/typography/links/vendorlist.aspx
[code: unknown]

⚠ WARN: Are there caret positions declared for every ligature? (com.google.fonts/check/ligature_carets)

⚠ WARN This font lacks caret position values for ligature glyphs on its GDEF table. [code: lacks-caret-pos]

⚠ WARN: Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences? (com.google.fonts/check/kerning_for_non_ligated_sequences)

⚠ WARN GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:
- f + f
- f + i
- i + f
- f + j
- j + f
- f + l
- l + f
- i + j
- j + l
- f.salt + f.salt
- And 6 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: lacks-kern-info]

⚠ WARN: Ensure variable fonts include an avar table. (com.google.fonts/check/mandatory_avar_table)

⚠ WARN This variable font does not have an avar table. [code: missing-avar]

⚠ WARN: Ensure Stylistic Sets have description. (com.google.fonts/check/stylisticset_description)

⚠ WARN The stylistic set ss01 lacks a description string on the 'name' table. [code: missing-description]
⚠ WARN The stylistic set ss01 lacks a description string on the 'name' table. [code: missing-description]
⚠ WARN The stylistic set ss01 lacks a description string on the 'name' table. [code: missing-description]
⚠ WARN The stylistic set ss01 lacks a description string on the 'name' table. [code: missing-description]
⚠ WARN The stylistic set ss01 lacks a description string on the 'name' table. [code: missing-description]
⚠ WARN The stylistic set ss01 lacks a description string on the 'name' table. [code: missing-description]
⚠ WARN The stylistic set ss01 lacks a description string on the 'name' table. [code: missing-description]
⚠ WARN The stylistic set ss01 lacks a description string on the 'name' table. [code: missing-description]
⚠ WARN The stylistic set ss01 lacks a description string on the 'name' table. [code: missing-description]

⚠ WARN: Ensure fonts have ScriptLangTags declared on the 'meta' table. (com.google.fonts/check/meta/script_lang_tags)

⚠ WARN This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

⚠ WARN: Checking with ots-sanitize. (com.google.fonts/check/ots)

⚠ WARN ots-sanitize passed this file, however warnings were printed:

WARNING: maxp: Bad maxZones: 0
[code: ots-sanitize-warn]

⚠ WARN: Check font contains no unreachable glyphs (com.google.fonts/check/unreachable_glyphs)

⚠ WARN The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- uni0312.case
  [code: unreachable-glyphs]

⚠ WARN: Does the font have a DSIG table? (com.google.fonts/check/dsig)

⚠ WARN This font has a digital signature (DSIG table) which is only required - even if only a placeholder - on old programs like MS Office 2013 in order to work properly.
The current recommendation is to completely remove the DSIG table. [code: found-DSIG]

⚠ WARN: Are there any misaligned on-curve points? (com.google.fonts/check/outline_alignment_miss)

⚠ WARN The following glyphs have on-curve points which have potentially incorrect y coordinates:
- ampersand (U+0026): X=561.0,Y=728.0 (should be at cap-height 730?)
- three (U+0033): X=139.5,Y=-1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)
- six (U+0036): X=589.0,Y=728.0 (should be at cap-height 730?)
- C (U+0043): X=597.0,Y=731.5 (should be at cap-height 730?)
- G (U+0047): X=595.0,Y=731.0 (should be at cap-height 730?)
- J (U+004A): X=131.5,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)
- S (U+0053): X=170.5,Y=-2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)
- a (U+0061): X=119.5,Y=-1.5 (should be at baseline 0?)
- b (U+0062): X=444.5,Y=1.0 (should be at baseline 0?)
- b (U+0062): X=324.5,Y=534.5 (should be at x-height 534?)
- And 69 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-misalignments]

ℹ INFO: Show hinting filesize impact. (com.google.fonts/check/hinting_impact)

ℹ INFO Hinting filesize impact:

	Sora-Italic[wght].ttf
Dehinted Size	84.1kb
Hinted Size	84.1kb
Increase	-24 bytes
Change	-0.0 %
[code: size-impact]

ℹ INFO: Font has old ttfautohint applied? (com.google.fonts/check/old_ttfautohint)

ℹ INFO Could not detect which version of ttfautohint was used in this font. It is typically specified as a comment in the font version entries of the 'name' table. Such font version strings are currently: ['Version 1.000', 'Version 1.000'] [code: version-not-detected]

ℹ INFO: EPAR table present in font? (com.google.fonts/check/epar)

ℹ INFO EPAR table not present in font. To learn more see When missing EPAR table, just emit INFO alert fonttools/fontbakery#818 [code: lacks-EPAR]

ℹ INFO: Check for font-v versioning. (com.google.fonts/check/fontv)

ℹ INFO Version string is: "Version 1.000"
The version string must ideally include a git commit hash and either a "dev" or a "release" suffix such as in the example below:
"Version 1.3; git-0d08353-release" [code: bad-format]

ℹ INFO: Font contains all required tables? (com.google.fonts/check/required_tables)

ℹ INFO This font contains the following optional tables:
- loca
- GPOS
- And GSUB [code: optional-tables]

ℹ INFO: List all superfamily filepaths (com.google.fonts/check/superfamily/list)

ℹ INFO . [code: family-path]

[21] Sora[wght].ttf

🔥 FAIL: Check Google Fonts glyph coverage. (com.google.fonts/check/glyph_coverage)

🔥 FAIL Missing required codepoints:
- 0x02D9 (DOT ABOVE)
- 0x0132 (LATIN CAPITAL LIGATURE IJ)
- 0x0133 (LATIN SMALL LIGATURE IJ)
- 0x02DD (DOUBLE ACUTE ACCENT)
- 0x02C7 (CARON)
- 0x02D8 (BREVE)
- And 0x02DB (OGONEK)
  [code: missing-codepoints]

🔥 FAIL: Check glyphs do not have components which are themselves components. (com.google.fonts/check/glyf_nested_components)

🔥 FAIL The following glyphs have components which themselves are component glyphs:
- Adieresis
- Dcroat
- Edieresis
- Idieresis
- Idieresis.salt
- Odieresis
- Udieresis
- Wdieresis
- Ydieresis
- adieresis and 24 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-nested-components]

🔥 FAIL: Check a font's STAT table contains compulsory Axis Values. (com.google.fonts/check/STAT)

🔥 FAIL Compulsory STAT Axis Values are incorrect:

Name	Axis	Current Value	Current Flags	Current LinkedValue	Expected Value	Expected Flags	Expected LinkedValue
Thin	wght	100.0	0	None	100.0	0	None
ExtraLight	wght	200.0	0	None	200.0	0	None
Light	wght	300.0	0	None	300.0	0	None
Regular	wght	400.0	2	None	400.0	2	700.0
Medium	wght	N/A	N/A	N/A	500.0	0	None
SemiBold	wght	600.0	0	None	600.0	0	None
Bold	wght	700.0	0	None	700.0	0	None
ExtraBold	wght	800.0	0	None	800.0	0	None
[code: bad-axis-values]

🔥 FAIL: Check variable font instances (com.google.fonts/check/fvar_instances)

🔥 FAIL fvar instances are incorrect:

Add missing instances

Name	current	expected
Thin	wght=100.0	wght=100.0
ExtraLight	wght=200.0	wght=200.0
Light	wght=300.0	wght=300.0
Regular	wght=400.0	wght=400.0
Medium	N/A	wght=500.0
SemiBold	wght=600.0	wght=600.0
Bold	wght=700.0	wght=700.0
ExtraBold	wght=800.0	wght=800.0

🔥 FAIL: Ensure component transforms do not perform scaling or rotation. (com.google.fonts/check/transformed_components)

🔥 FAIL The following glyphs had components with scaling or rotation
or inverted outline direction:
braceright (component braceleft)
braceright.case (component braceleft.case)
bracketright (component bracketleft)
bracketright.case (component bracketleft.case)
exclamdown (component exclam)
exclamdown.case (component exclam)
parenright (component parenleft)
parenright.case (component parenleft.case)
[code: transformed-components]

⚠ WARN: Checking OS/2 achVendID. (com.google.fonts/check/vendor_id)

⚠ WARN OS/2 VendorID value 'NONE' is not yet recognized. If you registered it recently, then it's safe to ignore this warning message. Otherwise, you should set it to your own unique 4 character code, and register it with Microsoft at https://www.microsoft.com/typography/links/vendorlist.aspx
[code: unknown]

⚠ WARN: Is there kerning info for non-ligated sequences? (com.google.fonts/check/kerning_for_non_ligated_sequences)

⚠ WARN GPOS table lacks kerning info for the following non-ligated sequences:
- f + f
- f + i
- i + f
- f + j
- j + f
- f + l
- l + f
- i + j
- j + l
- f.salt + f.salt
- And 7 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: lacks-kern-info]

⚠ WARN: Ensure variable fonts include an avar table. (com.google.fonts/check/mandatory_avar_table)

⚠ WARN This variable font does not have an avar table. [code: missing-avar]

⚠ WARN: Ensure Stylistic Sets have description. (com.google.fonts/check/stylisticset_description)

⚠ WARN The stylistic set ss01 lacks a description string on the 'name' table. [code: missing-description]

⚠ WARN: Ensure fonts have ScriptLangTags declared on the 'meta' table. (com.google.fonts/check/meta/script_lang_tags)

⚠ WARN This font file does not have a 'meta' table. [code: lacks-meta-table]

⚠ WARN: Check font contains no unreachable glyphs (com.google.fonts/check/unreachable_glyphs)

⚠ WARN The following glyphs could not be reached by codepoint or substitution rules:
- uni0312.case
  [code: unreachable-glyphs]

⚠ WARN: Ensure dotted circle glyph is present and can attach marks. (com.google.fonts/check/dotted_circle)

⚠ WARN No dotted circle glyph present [code: missing-dotted-circle]

⚠ WARN: Does the font have a DSIG table? (com.google.fonts/check/dsig)

⚠ WARN This font has a digital signature (DSIG table) which is only required - even if only a placeholder - on old programs like MS Office 2013 in order to work properly.
The current recommendation is to completely remove the DSIG table. [code: found-DSIG]

⚠ WARN: Are there any misaligned on-curve points? (com.google.fonts/check/outline_alignment_miss)

⚠ WARN The following glyphs have on-curve points which have potentially incorrect y coordinates:
- ampersand (U+0026): X=504.0,Y=728.0 (should be at cap-height 730?)
- six (U+0036): X=532.0,Y=728.0 (should be at cap-height 730?)
- nine (U+0039): X=127.0,Y=2.0 (should be at baseline 0?)
- g (U+0067): X=205.5,Y=532.0 (should be at x-height 534?)
- j (U+006A): X=108.5,Y=731.0 (should be at cap-height 730?)
- j (U+006A): X=203.5,Y=731.0 (should be at cap-height 730?)
- u (U+0075): X=80.0,Y=535.0 (should be at x-height 534?)
- u (U+0075): X=176.0,Y=535.0 (should be at x-height 534?)
- u (U+0075): X=438.0,Y=535.0 (should be at x-height 534?)
- u (U+0075): X=534.0,Y=535.0 (should be at x-height 534?)
- And 13 more.

Use -F or --full-lists to disable shortening of long lists. [code: found-misalignments]

ℹ INFO: Show hinting filesize impact. (com.google.fonts/check/hinting_impact)

ℹ INFO Hinting filesize impact:

	Sora[wght].ttf
Dehinted Size	108.8kb
Hinted Size	108.8kb
Increase	24 bytes
Change	0.0 %
[code: size-impact]

ℹ INFO: Font has old ttfautohint applied? (com.google.fonts/check/old_ttfautohint)

ℹ INFO Could not detect which version of ttfautohint was used in this font. It is typically specified as a comment in the font version entries of the 'name' table. Such font version strings are currently: ['Version 2.000'] [code: version-not-detected]

ℹ INFO: EPAR table present in font? (com.google.fonts/check/epar)

ℹ INFO EPAR table not present in font. To learn more see When missing EPAR table, just emit INFO alert fonttools/fontbakery#818 [code: lacks-EPAR]

ℹ INFO: Is the Grid-fitting and Scan-conversion Procedure ('gasp') table set to optimize rendering? (com.google.fonts/check/gasp)

ℹ INFO These are the ppm ranges declared on the gasp table:

PPM <= 65535:
flag = 0x0F
- Use grid-fitting
- Use grayscale rendering
- Use gridfitting with ClearType symmetric smoothing
- Use smoothing along multiple axes with ClearType®
[code: ranges]

ℹ INFO: Check for font-v versioning. (com.google.fonts/check/fontv)

ℹ INFO Version string is: "Version 2.000"
The version string must ideally include a git commit hash and either a "dev" or a "release" suffix such as in the example below:
"Version 1.3; git-0d08353-release" [code: bad-format]

ℹ INFO: Font contains all required tables? (com.google.fonts/check/required_tables)

ℹ INFO This font contains the following optional tables:
- loca
- prep
- GPOS
- GSUB
- And gasp [code: optional-tables]

ℹ INFO: List all superfamily filepaths (com.google.fonts/check/superfamily/list)

ℹ INFO . [code: family-path]

### Summary

💔 ERROR	🔥 FAIL	⚠ WARN	💤 SKIP	ℹ INFO	🍞 PASS	🔎 DEBUG
0	16	20	207	14	182	0
0%	4%	5%	47%	3%	41%	0%

Note: The following loglevels were omitted in this report:

SKIP
PASS
DEBUG

emmamarichal · 2023-01-26T13:20:13Z

It seems to be somewhere in the glyphsorder (line 575)

WRRicht3r · 2023-01-26T13:39:27Z

Hey @emmamarichal are you able to access this ?

emmamarichal · 2023-01-26T13:54:11Z

no, not this one either

emmamarichal · 2023-03-10T14:17:27Z

Hi @WRRicht3r, what is the status of the project here? :)
do you think you can add a new file for italics, since the current one doesn't work?

emmamarichal · 2023-12-13T15:03:45Z

Hi @WRRicht3r
Do you still want we onboard this upgrade, with italics? I just need you update the repo with the more recent sources :)

WRRicht3r · 2023-12-27T10:32:09Z

Hello Emma, Apologies for the delays with the response. We have been reaching out to the typeform designer who supported us with the initial implementation, but have yet to receive a response, therefore we have been unable to provide the missing assets. We hope he will get back to us soon so we can close this issue. Thanks and regards, William Richter Head of Ecosystem Growth

…

On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 4:03 PM Emma Marichal ***@***.***> wrote: Hi @WRRicht3r <https://github.com/WRRicht3r> Do you still want we onboard this upgrade, with italics? I just need you update the repo with the more recent sources :) — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#5827 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVCODG5YBUPNASIMHENQ42DYJG7V3AVCNFSM6AAAAAAUGM6MT2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQNJUGA4DGOBYGQ> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

SanderGo · 2024-03-24T15:15:25Z

Too bad this wasn't resolved.. I really like the font, and planned on using it.. only to find out there's no italics. Not sure why it would be posted like this, not very useful?

emmamarichal added III Expand styles more axes, wider range, addition of italic… III VF Replacement Replace an existing family of static fonts with variable fonts I Font Upgrade labels Jan 25, 2023

emmamarichal added this to the 2023 Q1 milestone Jan 25, 2023

emmamarichal self-assigned this Jan 25, 2023

emmamarichal removed the III VF Replacement Replace an existing family of static fonts with variable fonts label Jan 25, 2023

emmamarichal added the -- Upstream is working on it Designer is making changes in the upstream repo label Jan 25, 2023

emmamarichal modified the milestones: 2023 Q1, Projects to be commissioned and/or milestoned Mar 2, 2023

RosaWagner added this to Google Fonts Mar 7, 2023

github-project-automation bot moved this to Todo in Google Fonts Mar 7, 2023

RosaWagner modified the milestones: Projects to be commissioned and/or milestoned, 2023 Q2 Mar 7, 2023

chrissimpkins modified the milestones: 2023 Q2, 2023 Q3 Jul 17, 2023

emmamarichal modified the milestones: 2023 Q3, 2023 Q4 Sep 21, 2023

chrissimpkins modified the milestones: 2023 Q4, Icebox Jan 2, 2024

chrissimpkins moved this from Todo to Blocked in Google Fonts Jan 10, 2024

simoncozens mentioned this issue May 1, 2024

Fix format of italic source sora-xor/sora-font#23

Open

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Update Sora #5827

Update Sora #5827

emmamarichal commented Jan 25, 2023 •

edited

Loading

emmamarichal commented Jan 25, 2023

tarmovannas commented Jan 25, 2023

emmamarichal commented Jan 25, 2023

WRRicht3r commented Jan 25, 2023

emmamarichal commented Jan 25, 2023

WRRicht3r commented Jan 25, 2023

emmamarichal commented Jan 25, 2023

WRRicht3r commented Jan 26, 2023

emmamarichal commented Jan 26, 2023

emmamarichal commented Jan 26, 2023

WRRicht3r commented Jan 26, 2023

emmamarichal commented Jan 26, 2023

emmamarichal commented Mar 10, 2023

emmamarichal commented Dec 13, 2023

WRRicht3r commented Dec 27, 2023 via email

SanderGo commented Mar 24, 2024

Update Sora #5827

Update Sora #5827

Comments

emmamarichal commented Jan 25, 2023 • edited Loading

emmamarichal commented Jan 25, 2023

tarmovannas commented Jan 25, 2023

emmamarichal commented Jan 25, 2023

WRRicht3r commented Jan 25, 2023

emmamarichal commented Jan 25, 2023

WRRicht3r commented Jan 25, 2023

emmamarichal commented Jan 25, 2023

WRRicht3r commented Jan 26, 2023

emmamarichal commented Jan 26, 2023

Fontbakery report

emmamarichal commented Jan 26, 2023

WRRicht3r commented Jan 26, 2023

emmamarichal commented Jan 26, 2023

emmamarichal commented Mar 10, 2023

emmamarichal commented Dec 13, 2023

WRRicht3r commented Dec 27, 2023 via email

SanderGo commented Mar 24, 2024

emmamarichal commented Jan 25, 2023 •

edited

Loading