Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

x/vulndb: potential Go vuln in github.com/traefik/traefik: CVE-2022-23632 #325

Closed
GoVulnBot opened this issue Feb 17, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels
cve-year-2022 excluded: EFFECTIVELY_PRIVATE This vulnerability exists in a package can be imported, but isn't meant to be outside that module.

Comments

@GoVulnBot
Copy link

In CVE-2022-23632, the reference URL github.com/traefik/traefik (and possibly others) refers to something in Go.

module: github.com/traefik/traefik
package: traefik
description: |
    Traefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Prior to version 2.6.1, Traefik skips the router transport layer security (TLS) configuration when the host header is a fully qualified domain name (FQDN). For a request, the TLS configuration choice can be different than the router choice, which implies the use of a wrong TLS configuration. When sending a request using FQDN handled by a router configured with a dedicated TLS configuration, the TLS configuration falls back to the default configuration that might not correspond to the configured one. If the CNAME flattening is enabled, the selected TLS configuration is the SNI one and the routing uses the CNAME value, so this can skip the expected TLS configuration. Version 2.6.1 contains a patch for this issue. As a workaround, one may add the FDQN to the host rule. However, there is no workaround if the CNAME flattening is enabled.
cves:
  - CVE-2022-23632
links:
    pr: https://github.com/traefik/traefik/pull/8764
    context:
      - https://github.com/traefik/traefik/releases/tag/v2.6.1
      - https://github.com/traefik/traefik/security/advisories/GHSA-hrhx-6h34-j5hc

See doc/triage.md for instructions on how to triage this report.

@julieqiu julieqiu self-assigned this Feb 22, 2022
@julieqiu
Copy link
Member

Vulnerability in tool

@neild neild added excluded: EFFECTIVELY_PRIVATE This vulnerability exists in a package can be imported, but isn't meant to be outside that module. and removed NotGoVuln labels Aug 11, 2022
@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Change https://go.dev/cl/592766 mentions this issue: data/reports: unexclude 50 reports

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Change https://go.dev/cl/607216 mentions this issue: data/reports: unexclude 20 reports (14)

gopherbot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 21, 2024
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0314.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0315.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0325.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0328.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0329.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0339.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0340.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0342.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0344.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0348.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0350.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0351.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0353.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0354.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0357.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0358.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0359.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0360.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0363.yaml
  - data/reports/GO-2022-0365.yaml

Updates #314
Updates #315
Updates #325
Updates #328
Updates #329
Updates #339
Updates #340
Updates #342
Updates #344
Updates #348
Updates #350
Updates #351
Updates #353
Updates #354
Updates #357
Updates #358
Updates #359
Updates #360
Updates #363
Updates #365

Change-Id: I88cff49c8c254ce8df68a3fb336657e69cb8ed58
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/vulndb/+/607216
Commit-Queue: Tatiana Bradley <tatianabradley@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Tatiana Bradley <tatianabradley@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Neil <dneil@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cve-year-2022 excluded: EFFECTIVELY_PRIVATE This vulnerability exists in a package can be imported, but isn't meant to be outside that module.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants