-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
x/tools/go/internal/gcimporter: frequent "out of memory" failures on 32-bit builders #45931
Comments
It may be the latter, considering that we're not seeing equivalent OOMing in Note that the Scaleway builders are slated for deprecation: |
Yep, but AFAIK the |
Change https://golang.org/cl/322409 mentions this issue: |
CL 303230 renamed the linux-arm builder to linux-arm-scaleway, but the x/tools ExitIfSmallMachine guard was not updated accordingly, resulting in consistent failures for some tests. For golang/go#45931 For golang/go#46183 Updates golang/go#32834 Change-Id: Ief5f17fc61cb38cf6b7cf63b6cd5e64f9d56261e Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/322409 Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com> Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com> gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
CL 303230 renamed the linux-arm builder to linux-arm-scaleway, but the x/tools ExitIfSmallMachine guard was not updated accordingly, resulting in consistent failures for some tests. For golang/go#45931 For golang/go#46183 Updates golang/go#32834 Change-Id: Ief5f17fc61cb38cf6b7cf63b6cd5e64f9d56261e Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/322409 Trust: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com> Run-TryBot: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com> gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Rebecca Stambler <rstambler@golang.org>
It's not clear to me whether these test failures are due to a problem in
gcimporter
itself, or due to memory pressure from concurrently-running tests for another package, but the failure rate for thex/tools
repo on thelinux-arm-scaleway
builder especially is quite high, and thewindows-386-2008
failure rate is at least high enough that I noticed it on a TryBot run (https://storage.googleapis.com/go-build-log/7f9febd4/windows-386-2008_2222fa56.log).Perhaps
gcimporter_test
needs a lower concurrency limit on 32-bit platforms?CC @stamblerre @griesemer
2021-05-03T16:38:18-062bf4e/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-05-03T16:36:24-3e17c62/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-30T20:08:34-7a6108e/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-30T19:49:23-edbe9be/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-30T16:06:43-9b9633e/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-30T14:46:28-291330a/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-29T19:34:21-aec1372/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-29T13:06:21-28c1392/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-28T21:52:02-800adbe/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-28T01:46:37-16b25d2/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-27T20:55:22-7c72a84/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-27T19:53:45-d0768c9/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-27T15:36:10-6397a11/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-27T13:49:53-7b9993c/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-27T12:58:28-fe1c548/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-27T04:02:17-735ed62/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-26T20:11:56-e3dc99f/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-26T16:33:32-cf354b6/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-26T15:43:18-7c93484/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-23T21:15:18-f74a669/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-23T19:11:18-e435455/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-23T17:35:25-f7e8e24/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-22T17:05:18-f946a15/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-22T04:15:51-4934781/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-22T02:57:26-b3e5b99/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-20T19:23:16-e74674a/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-20T15:21:37-a13dbf1/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-19T19:59:27-10909d8/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-19T17:36:27-1dce19d/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-16T22:42:28-07295ca/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-16T18:23:08-fe50371/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-15T23:21:34-cb5dc85/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-15T21:16:26-799b682/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-14T19:50:58-d1362d7/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-14T19:20:17-59a2b45/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-12T17:45:26-2140cce/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-12T17:45:26-2140cce/windows-386-2008
2021-04-09T16:31:56-ec686a2/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-08T20:55:59-0243799/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-08T19:22:05-be791d0/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-08T02:08:45-b261fe9/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-07T17:38:53-e78b40c/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-07T10:44:45-3ac76b8/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-06T19:05:28-c602466/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-06T19:05:28-c602466/netbsd-386-9_0
2021-04-06T13:38:10-35a9159/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-06T04:24:37-5d33438/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-04-05T22:17:18-11c3f83/linux-arm-scaleway
2021-03-12T18:55:53-8e4f4c8/windows-386-2008
2021-03-03T21:54:20-376db57/windows-386-2008
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: