-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix raw wiki links (#31825) #31845
Merged
Merged
Fix raw wiki links (#31825) #31845
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Fix go-gitea#31395 This regression is introduced by go-gitea#30273. To find out how GitHub handles this case, I did [some tests](go-gitea#31395 (comment)). I use redirect in this PR instead of checking if the corresponding `.md` file exists when rendering the link because GitHub also uses redirect. With this PR, there is no need to resolve the raw wiki link when rendering a wiki page. If a wiki link points to a raw file, access will be redirected to the raw link.
GiteaBot
added
the
lgtm/need 2
This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging.
label
Aug 16, 2024
pull-request-size
bot
added
the
size/L
Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
label
Aug 16, 2024
… (go-gitea#31837) Backport go-gitea#31832 by @yp05327 Fix go-gitea#31807 ps: the newly added params's value will be changed. When the first time you selected the filter, the values of params will be `0` or `1` But in pager it will be `true` or `false`. So do we have `boolToInt` function? Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
wolfogre
approved these changes
Aug 16, 2024
GiteaBot
added
lgtm/need 1
This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged.
and removed
lgtm/need 2
This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging.
labels
Aug 16, 2024
lunny
approved these changes
Aug 16, 2024
GiteaBot
added
lgtm/done
This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore.
and removed
lgtm/need 1
This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged.
labels
Aug 16, 2024
@Zettat123 lint error is related. |
…o-gitea#31848) Backport go-gitea#31843 by @wolfogre Fix go-gitea#31625. If `pull_service.NewPullRequest` return an error which misses each `if` check, `CompareAndPullRequestPost` will return immediately, since it doesn't write the HTTP response, a 200 response with empty body will be sent to clients. ```go if err := pull_service.NewPullRequest(ctx, repo, pullIssue, labelIDs, attachments, pullRequest, assigneeIDs); err != nil { if repo_model.IsErrUserDoesNotHaveAccessToRepo(err) { ctx.Error(http.StatusBadRequest, "UserDoesNotHaveAccessToRepo", err.Error()) } else if git.IsErrPushRejected(err) { // ... ctx.JSONError(flashError) } else if errors.Is(err, user_model.ErrBlockedUser) { // ... ctx.JSONError(flashError) } else if errors.Is(err, issues_model.ErrMustCollaborator) { // ... ctx.JSONError(flashError) } return } ``` Not sure what kind of error can cause it to happen, so this PR just expose it. And we can fix it when users report that creating PRs failed with error responses. It's all my guess since I cannot reproduce the problem, but even if it's not related, the code here needs to be improved. Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
… GiteaBot-backport-31825-v1.22
lunny
added
the
reviewed/wait-merge
This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon.
label
Aug 17, 2024
GiteaBot
removed
the
reviewed/wait-merge
This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon.
label
Aug 17, 2024
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
lgtm/done
This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore.
modifies/go
Pull requests that update Go code
size/L
Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
type/bug
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport #31825 by @Zettat123
Fix #31395
This regression is introduced by #30273. To find out how GitHub handles this case, I did some tests.
I use redirect in this PR instead of checking if the corresponding
.md
file exists when rendering the link because GitHub also uses redirect. With this PR, there is no need to resolve the raw wiki link when rendering a wiki page. If a wiki link points to a raw file, access will be redirected to the raw link.