Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change the default maxPerPage for gitbucket (#30392) #30471

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 14, 2024

Conversation

lunny
Copy link
Member

@lunny lunny commented Apr 14, 2024

Backport #30392

This patch improves the migration from gitbucket to gitea.

The gitbucket uses it's own internal perPage value (= 25) for paging and ignore per_page arguments in the requested URL. This cause gitea to migrate only 25 issues and 25 PRs from gitbucket repository. This may not happens on old gitbucket. But recent gitbucket 4.40 or 4.38.4 has this problem.

This patch change to use this internally hardcoded perPage of gitbucket as gitea's maxPerPage numer when migrating from gitbucket. There are several perPage values in gitbucket like 25 for Isseus/PRs and 10 for Releases. Some of those API doesn't support paging yet. It sounds difficult to implement, but using the minimum number among them worked out very well. So, I use 10 in this patch.

Brief descriptions of problems and this patch are also available in #30316.

In addition, I'm not sure what kind of test cases are possible to write here. It's a test for migration, so it requires testing gitbucket server and gitea server, I guess. Please let me know if it is possible to write such test cases here. Thanks!

This patch improves the migration from gitbucket to gitea.

The gitbucket uses it's own internal perPage value (= 25) for paging and
ignore per_page arguments in the requested URL. This cause gitea to
migrate only 25 issues and 25 PRs from gitbucket repository. This may
not happens on old gitbucket. But recent gitbucket 4.40 or 4.38.4 has
this problem.

This patch change to use this internally hardcoded perPage of gitbucket
as gitea's maxPerPage numer when migrating from gitbucket. There are
several perPage values in gitbucket like 25 for Isseus/PRs and 10 for
Releases. Some of those API doesn't support paging yet. It sounds
difficult to implement, but using the minimum number among them worked
out very well. So, I use 10 in this patch.

Brief descriptions of problems and this patch are also available in
go-gitea#30316.

In addition, I'm not sure what kind of test cases are possible to write
here. It's a test for migration, so it requires testing gitbucket server
and gitea server, I guess. Please let me know if it is possible to write
such test cases here. Thanks!
@lunny lunny added the type/bug label Apr 14, 2024
@lunny lunny added this to the 1.21.11 milestone Apr 14, 2024
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Apr 14, 2024
@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 14, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the modifies/go Pull requests that update Go code label Apr 14, 2024
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Apr 14, 2024
@silverwind silverwind enabled auto-merge (squash) April 14, 2024 11:45
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Apr 14, 2024
@silverwind silverwind added the reviewed/wait-merge This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon. label Apr 14, 2024
@silverwind silverwind merged commit b6379d2 into go-gitea:release/v1.21 Apr 14, 2024
27 checks passed
@GiteaBot GiteaBot removed the reviewed/wait-merge This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon. label Apr 14, 2024
@lunny lunny deleted the lunny/backport_30392 branch April 14, 2024 13:00
@go-gitea go-gitea locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 14, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. modifies/go Pull requests that update Go code size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. type/bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants