-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Only use supported sort order for "explore/users" page (#29430) #29443
Merged
lunny
merged 5 commits into
go-gitea:release/v1.21
from
wxiaoguang:backport-explore-user
Mar 3, 2024
Merged
Only use supported sort order for "explore/users" page (#29430) #29443
lunny
merged 5 commits into
go-gitea:release/v1.21
from
wxiaoguang:backport-explore-user
Mar 3, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Thanks to inferenceus : some sort orders on the "explore/users" page could list users by their lastlogintime/updatetime. It leaks user's activity unintentionally. This PR makes that page only use "supported" sort orders. Removing the "sort orders" could also be a good solution, while IMO at the moment keeping the "create time" and "name" orders is also fine, in case some users would like to find a target user in the search result, the "sort order" might help. ![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2114189/ce5c39c1-1e86-484a-80c3-33cac6419af8) # Conflicts: # routers/web/explore/org.go # routers/web/explore/user.go
GiteaBot
added
the
lgtm/need 2
This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging.
label
Feb 27, 2024
pull-request-size
bot
added
the
size/M
Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
label
Feb 27, 2024
lunny
approved these changes
Feb 27, 2024
GiteaBot
added
lgtm/need 1
This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged.
and removed
lgtm/need 2
This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging.
labels
Feb 27, 2024
CI complains about missing variables |
lunny
approved these changes
Mar 1, 2024
appleboy
approved these changes
Mar 3, 2024
GiteaBot
added
lgtm/done
This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore.
and removed
lgtm/need 1
This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged.
labels
Mar 3, 2024
lunny
added
the
reviewed/wait-merge
This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon.
label
Mar 3, 2024
GiteaBot
removed
the
reviewed/wait-merge
This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon.
label
Mar 3, 2024
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport #29430
Thanks to inferenceus : some sort orders on the "explore/users" page could list users by their lastlogintime/updatetime.
It leaks user's activity unintentionally. This PR makes that page only use "supported" sort orders.
Removing the "sort orders" could also be a good solution, while IMO at the moment keeping the "create time" and "name" orders is also fine, in case some users would like to find a target user in the search result, the "sort order" might help.