Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix missing orgnization discord webhook #2414

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 29, 2017

Conversation

lunny
Copy link
Member

@lunny lunny commented Aug 28, 2017

And also remove the unused color default value on edit UI.

@lunny lunny added the type/bug label Aug 28, 2017
@lunny lunny added this to the 1.3.0 milestone Aug 28, 2017
@lafriks
Copy link
Member

lafriks commented Aug 28, 2017

LGTM

@tboerger tboerger added the lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. label Aug 28, 2017
@bkcsoft
Copy link
Member

bkcsoft commented Aug 28, 2017

LGTM

@tboerger tboerger added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Aug 28, 2017
@bkcsoft
Copy link
Member

bkcsoft commented Aug 28, 2017

@lunny Tests fail?

@lunny lunny merged commit 15d3872 into go-gitea:master Aug 29, 2017
@lunny lunny deleted the lunny/update_webhook_discord branch August 29, 2017 01:23
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 23, 2020
6543 pushed a commit to 6543-forks/gitea that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
- The hook regeneration code relies on `git.SupportProcReceive` being
set to determine if the `proc-receive` hook should be written, this
variable is set when the git module is initialized.
- Resolves go-gitea#2414
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. type/bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants